More of the Same Haunts the Land Division Meeting

September 23rd, 2009
Hi Webbers, to re-emphasize the sound warnings from “our hero,” the outgoing oracle of Civil Rights, Mr. Alan Borovoy, and I quote, “On civil liberties there is still work to do. The biggest threat to that work is public apathy! It has declined, but public apathy is a constant!”
More true words were never spoken, Mr. Borovoy. Thank you again, and again and again. After 41 years, yes Webbers – 41 years, you will see Mr. Borovoy for yourself, public apathy may be, as you say, is on the decline, however sir, as sad as it is to recognize, by a few of your “fellow travelers,” not it appears, in Wellington County, Ontario. But take heart, sir, those of us who have watched with interest and fascination your personal quest, arguably at personal costs in close relationships of long standing, it has been and will continue to be growing in awareness. No “Mien Kamph,” this time, Alan! Apathy is a deadly disease which must be eradicated!
Webbers, with serious understanding by Smelly-Welly.com, of the “apathetically protected” behaviour patterns of all of our adversaries, we have re-commenced our strategic campaign, designed to expose and eradicate from our lives, and “fiscally burdened lives,” this great “Criminal Menu,” long established and purveyed by “The Cordon Bleu chefs” of deception in Wellington County! (Why the French don’t know how to express themselves in English, I don’t know! In Scotland we would say, “The wommin’ is a braw cook!” Now what’s wrong with that?) “Cordon Bleu” my touché! No wonder they want out! (Humour Webbers).
This week we attended, and recorded electronically, the Committee proceedings at the infamous Planning and Land Division. When we download the data this coming week, we will have a few “candies” for upon which you can chew!
We can’t inundate your capacity for absorption and related necessary total comprehension, by overloading your protected circuits, the breakers would kick in and continuity of understanding severely impacted!
We learned at the Land Division Meeting that our previously reported “modus operandi” is still in place in this forum, meeting under the guise of  “fair and equitable” considerations of submitted land severance applications. It gives me no pleasure to do what I must do to identify and expose what I will allege, pending the conclusion of our statistical, historical handling of severance applications and other so-called Planning Issues, that all is not what it seems. Nor has it been for some time.
Last month, August, I was requested, at the last minute, to assist a lady who had submitted a severance request to the Land Division Committee, represented by a professional Planner who spoke eloquently, and in my view, accurately, with logical and concise details, about his professional justification of his submission on behalf of his client. This resulted in a rejection by Committee by a 3-2 margin. Those voting for the rejection were Warden Ross Zuj (with no reason given), Councillor Carl Hall (who always votes with the Warden (per statistical evidence)), and Chairman Walter Traschel, who has proven to be a major disappointment to me personally, as I held out high hopes for him, once he realized the games being played! I was wrong! He votes, as Chairman, last (the carrying vote) and always with the Warden, but on occasion will “huff & puff,” indicating guilt for doing so, at least that is my opinion! He can confirm or reject this opinion, under oath, from the Witness box in Court! The O.M.B. Hearing in Erin on July 20th 2009 was adjudicated by O.M.B. Chairman Mr. J. Chee-Hing (member). For the record, when I received, by mailed copy to Ms. Rowan, the Board Members decision, I was tempted to formally appeal per the recorded basis of Mr. Chee-Hing’s decision. The Chairman misrepresented the facts of the Hearing. I intentionally did not appeal, but will submit my challenge to the Chairman, questioning the stated accuracy of the submitted evidentiary details of my presentation in support of the Appeal. I shall call Mr. Chee-Hing as a witness at our upcoming trail, against the County of Wellington (et al), in reference to our indicated Land Division Committee charges, previously recorded.
By copy of this letter I would request the Chairman, and the Ontario Municipal Board retain and seal the recorded oral submission taken via digital recordings. We shall be requesting, via purchase, copies for our evidentiary package. I shall also be forwarding my letter of clarification, similar to the letter which has been filed and distributed by Mr. Lou Maieron, my witness, who was not “summonsed” but “subpoenaed” purposely by me. A significant point of clarification.
The Chairman’s written account of the Proceedings is as porous and Swiss cheese, the records must be accurate, otherwise the Board’s function is open to criticism!
By separate cover I shall extend to Mr. J. Chee-Hing, O.M.B. member, the professional courtesy of an explanatory letter, on a “personal” basis! Only courtesy Webbers! Keep watching and talking Webbers! God bless!
Bill Manderson
PS : I will be attaching a PDF acquired copy of Mr. J. Chee-Hing’s decision, for the record, an important addition!

 

Back to HOME