March 30th, 2010
High activity time Webbers, from all over the world now, from China to Chittagong, Australia to Russia, from Spain to Acapulco, from Scotland to Scandinavia, from Victoria B.C. to Halifax N.S. and all points in-between. To all of you who now continue to show your interest in our various “files” we say, on our first anniversary of Smelly-Welly.com, thank you all for your readership and emails of support and encouragement, you have assisted us greatly in making our Wellington County Council politicians known for their antics on a global stage; McCarthy Tétrault should be paying us for their exposure to the world, just how not to run a law firm, and “Doug Thomson” now is universally know, (for what will now be determined). Who would have thought this, established by necessity, website, in obscure Guelph, Ontario, could have, in one year, generated world wide readership of a weekly, at worst, reference to enlighten others, facing our mutual frustrations to realize this problem of municipal corruption, is anything like being local! Universal Webbers, you have demonstrated your interest and support by your hit count! We shall not fail you. We are moved and most appreciative, and will continue to advance to Justice! God speed people, special people (i.e. our supporters!)
I wish now to clearly explain why I responded to a reporter’s question, referencing our recent over one and a half year old Peace Bond farce, which is now, thank God, scheduled for Court in August of this year – mandated! Mandated by the senior Justice of the Peace, who took exception to the, requested by this integrity driven fourth largest law firm in Ontario, McCarthy Tétrault L.L.P. Yes, the same firm being sued by their former specialist lawyer, Ms. Diane LaCalamita. Ms. LaCalamita is only suing for $12 million dollars; yes you read it right - $12 million dollars. Hey, maybe that’s why they have turned up the heat on me – and tried to manipulate the Court (a no-no), to push our frivolous and vexations Peace Bond charge, at 100% cost to the local taxpayers, to dates which, apparently, has angered greatly the Senior Justice of the Peace, His Worship Taylor. Please, full understand my statement of “ecstatic” as reported (click here to view), in the press on that Saturday after the Friday Hearing, and accurately in both of our local newspapers (i.e.) the Guelph Mercury on that Saturday.
Professionally presented by the Mercury’s fine, experienced reporter Rob O’Flanagan, and the following Thursday publication of the weekly Wellington Advertiser by the equally good reporter, Mr. Chris Dapointe, a young man with a bright future, in our estimation.
My statement was a response to the question from Mr. Dapointe, “Are you happy with the Court’s decision?” I answered, “No, I am not happy with the decision, I am ecstatic!” Webbers, let me tell you the truthful facts related to this matter and all witnessed by the very credible professional members of the Judiciary and the legal profession per sé. This will cause you to ask, “Why does McCarthy Tétrault send expendable “cannon fodder pseudo lawyers” to continue to illustrate this law firm’s lack of reality?” Let me explain further; this is important!
McCarthy Tétrault, via Doug Thomson, has recently “sent out signals,” that they have expanded their cafeteria menu to now include “political advisors” as a service offered to those who would request it, like, say, Wellington County “operating team.” Something like the same type of “unique service” opportunities which seduced Ms. Diane LaCalamita to join this “visionary law firm,” much to her current regret. Let me explain further the application of this “service” to facilitate a “losing bid for re-election” of Whitcombe in Puslinch, and Wilson in Orangeville, part of Dufferin County – you know, north of here, from where Wilson came, somewhat under “clouded pressure” to join Archie MacRobbie and his “Star Chamber” organization in Wellington County Council. Archie’s recognized “idea’s man” was now C.A.O. and it started 10 (ten) years ago! A very significant “period of time” as Wilson was installed as C.A.O./Treasurer, pending “the Dyer move” from the city of Guelph, recently challenged for understanding during the Arbitration Hearings between the city of Guelph and the County of Wellington. Time to connect the dots, Webbers. 10 (ten) years ago Whitcombe was Warden, for his first term of one (1) year, his “accelerated” turn, per the “Star Chamber” plan. (We will explain more at Trial Webbers.) This gets so “entangled” with the appearance in 2000 of the Riverbend Legal Group. Wow! And here we are again, with our destiny to be adversaries fully met, today and destined to be “cleaned up” permanently in the imminent future – wow! Couldn’t have planned it better myself!
The ambitiously arrogant Scott Wilson has been, for 10 (ten) years, planning his return to Dufferin County as a Councillor. His is on his last chance but is weighted down by all of his current baggage. Let’s look at the Orangeville Town Council today and in this election year of 2010 – Wilson’s planned opportunity to make his move!
Wilson, this year, will complete his first term as an Orangeville Town Councillor. It is, I believe, per the record, been a “tumultuous time,” brought down on Orangeville, as planned by Wilson, for the sole purpose of driving a political wedge between the Mayor, Mr. Adams, and the Deputy Mayor, Mr. Maycock. Wilson’s purpose was to, as planned, run for the Mayor’s seat if he thought it achievable and if not, run for the Deputy Mayor’s position. You see Webbers, either seat will assure him of a seat on Dufferin County Council, per the process, which permits Orangeville, because of their greatest population numbers to represent, to send 2 (two) representatives to County Council.
You must admit Webbers, it’s a pretty good, although devious, plan that Mr. Wilson has set up for himself, but arrogantly assumes that the “little people” will put “little crosses” in “little boxes” by his name on the ballot!
The “baggage fallout” from any Peace Bond Trial, before the October Municipal Elections, would, not could, impact his chances to:

1. Isolate the Mayor and Deputy Mayor

2. Open the door through the ensuing chaos

3. Choose his declaration of choice of seat, and

4. Gamble to win in a “divided” environment!

Result: A seat on Dufferin County Council, his only focused goal which, if achieved, will open up all kinds of future political opportunities for this individual, hoping to facilitate his plan, of course supported by an apathetic electorate! “Vote for Scotty at your peril!”
Now lets look at Whitcombe, the “incumbent Mayor” who, for the first time since his initial success in Puslinch, is now facing a serious threat from Mr. Denis Leaver to unseat the “immovable Whitcombe,” all because of voter apathy and, I believe, the narrow minded “old money” in Puslinch. What a crock! These blind people will continue to vote the same way as always? Well, maybe not this time! Remember the “fall from grace” in his “Warden year” of the “dishonourable David Adsett.” The “little old ladies of Guelph Eramosa” did not approve of his arrogant “personal” behaviour towards his personal family – he was gone, in short order, as is on the record. Webbers, personal integrity, as perceived by the voting public, is a pre-requisite for any politician, no matter who! Whitcombe finds himself in a “somewhat similar” position, as confronted his buddy David Adsett. Remember the Sage Family drama guys? It was always scheduled to come back and haunt him, and it will this year, I promise! Truth will drive Justice, sometimes it takes a while, I have been more than patient – Showtime guys! The huge level of outstanding questions to be answered by Whitcombe in Puslinch will expose this individuals “true colours.”
So Webbers, now do you understand McCarthy Tétrault’s complicity in this devious attempt by the parties to manipulate the legal process of Justice to protect their high paying clients? Is there no end to this attraction of “billable hours” that McCarthy Tétrault would gamble with their firm’s reputation, and endorse this “manipulation” of Court time, resulting in, if achieved, a record 2 (two) years to hear a 1 (one) day Peace Bond Trial? Then, even when confronted by the dictated reality of the directive from His Worship Taylor J.P, would still, with conflicting submissions, send the expendable “little girl” arrogant lawyer to Court in Guelph on two (2) occasions to receive the wrath of the Court, from Her Worship Rodney J.P., and His Worship Walter Rojek J.P.! This “silly little girl” of a lawyer, a standard McCarthy product of blind allegiance brainwashing, arrogantly still pushed the party line and attempted to mislead the Court intentionally, much, I believe, to the pleasure of His Worship.
Mr. Oaks very strongly vocally objected to this intentionally misleading of the Court by Ms. Sharon Wilmot, “silly little girl lawyer” from McCarthy Tétrault. Such a shame Webbers, she was probably a good law student, as McCarthy Tétrault always sucks the best each year! But, of course, though behaviour like Wilmot’s has an annual attrition rate of cannon fodder, “silly” young lawyers who are let go! Is this fair? “Toe the party line or you are oot!”
So Webbers, now you see why I am “ecstatic” with the ruling from His Worship Taylor; it tells me, maybe even the judiciary are becoming aware of McCarthy Tétrault’s plan, all for billable hours. $500,000 worth to date and counting! Ah, legal integrity, where has it gone? I can just hear Mr. John Houseman, in his eloquence and with “dulcet tones,” quote: “At McCarthy Tétrault, we make our money the old fashioned way – we steal it!” Sue me! Go on, sue me again, if you have “what it takes” as men, but take a number, count them now, three (3) cases, i.e. Peace Bond, Libel and Contempt of Court, and never once, from either of your clients, Wilson or Whitcombe – “I am innocent of any and all the accusations of municipal corruption promoted by Mr. Manderson.” Ever wonder why Webbers? I think we all know now! What a mess, but we can clean it up – you’ll see!” God bless and keep webbin’.

March 6th - This Troy Shall Not Fall!
“Spring is in the air, every sight and every sound,
            Change is in the air, everywhere I look around.”
Good song Webbers and very timely for applicability! Let’s just consider recent events! Consider this! The impending final battle with “all of the marbles” as the spoils of war are being constructed on our war room table for Smelly-Welly.com’s strategic considerations, reviews and ultimate implementation plan to bring Justice to all who have been, over time, grievously assaulted, bothe emotionally and long term, psychologically, to there permanent detriment, and the majority of them in their senior years, at time of life supposed to be the Golden Years! As one of my 75+ year olds expressed it thus: The “Golden Years have come to pass, the Golden Years can kiss my ass!”
It is a “no brainer” to deduce that he is a solid member of the Riverbend Legal group! You don’t know about them? Ask Mayor Whitcombe of Puslinch Township – he knows – oh how he knows!
Webbers, you have noticed on our website, and reported in the press, that our “adversaries,” hiding behind the 2 (two) front men, posing as plaintiffs, have had a “change of heart in the Libel action against me! My response to their “Trojan Horse” offer is to “stick it up your nose.” My Troy will not fall! You betcha! “Oh no,” they cry! Now we’ll have to cut in “plan B.” “If we can’t shut him down with “Poisen Bait” then we must immediately go back into the “Bully mode” and serve him with a contempt of Court Motion” – which is what they did at 3:00 PM on Friday, 26th February 2010, with an indicated “return” time notice of the Motions Court Hearing, scheduled to be addressed for the first time at 9:30 AM in Superior Court in Guelph on Tuesday March 9th, 2010! Mmmm! Guess they didn’t like my rejection of their Trojan Horse gift, (i.e. “Stick it up your nose”). Is it not interesting that they could respond so quickly? Why, it’s almost as if it were planned! (sarcasm).
Their arrogant transparency is a welcome enabler in their predictability! Oh, Doug Thomson of McCarthy Tétrault, you are as transparent as good old Irish crystal…you’re not Irish, are you?
As the puppet master of your McCarthy Tétrault “cannon fodder” puppet associate, lawyer errand “boys and girls,” you need to change your stables! First young Tanner, who screwed up the original Peace Bond plan, only to be followed by the arrogant “little prig” (I did not say prig), of an “errand girl” named Sharon Wilmot, trying so hard to follow the audio instructions from the cassette tape in her forehead, earned herself the contempt of all in attendance at the Peace Bond Hearing in the Guelph Courtroom, and this was only to set trial dates! It was disgusting to witness this so-called “officer of the court” strut her stuff!
But, I would submit, characteristic of the brainwashed cannon fodder, expendable associates hired by McCarthy Tétrault and their ilk, in the legal world to facilitate their oppositions’ expenditure of ammunition, hoping all ammunition will be used before the final emergence from the shadows of that pinnacle of legal integrity and professionalism, the worshipful Douglas Thomson, who now, in the “high costed” employ of Wellington County Council (paid by the taxpayer), has expanded his retainer to include Political Advisor to add to his retainer cost as Legal Advisor, at least in my entitled opinion! When will you grace our Guelph Courtrooms with your presence? Everyone you have sent to date has dragged their respective touches back to Toronto, in disgrace and failure, including your “perceived apprentice” the “errand boy” Wayland. His performances before Justices Herold and Hourigan have, I am sure, endeared him to these two honourable Justices, of high repute and long experience. Hey Webbers, check out the respective transcripts, which you will find enlightening, you know, kinda like “your tax dollars at work!” Oh so transparent – and not only to me!
Is this not sad Webbers? And all for what? To silence this old guy with the whole country watching! Oh my, oh my, what a pathetic situation created for what? Did you think you could cover up municipal corruption forever? You are all nuts! Your goose is cooked, confess, take the hit like a man, not that you know what that means!
Webbers, do they expect us to all believe their explanation for the amended statement of claim from $2.4 Million dollars down to $1.00, plus Court costs, at the worst $1000? “We did it our of the kindness of our hearts, recognizing Manderson’s financial status!” What, after a year and the submission of 2 (two) separate Affidavits, quoting financial issues? These guys are very poor “deceivers,” they have no audit trail of anything they have done, and expose their stupidity and lack of process with behaviour like this!! Stupid! (Thank God!) This is easy! (Not tempted to deviate from my effective plan.) They think we are all like them! They will soon discover that this is a bad thought. Enough for now Webbers, we are “ecstatic” as reported in the Guelph Mercury on Saturday 27th February 2010, a report worth the read. (Click here to read). Keep on webbin’. God bless.

March 4th, 2010 - Webbers! Lets talk the Power of Truth!
At this stage now, adding to everything else, with assumed impacting timing of introduction, our adversaries have been forced, in desperation, to apply their “remedy of last resort” as recorded in the transcripts, (pages #8 & 9), related to the McCarthy Tétrault requested Hearing before Justice Herold on May 6th 2009 as is recorded. Mr. Wayland, arguably, at this Hearing, conducted himself in the most amateurish way, transparently, to attempt to introduce a Contempt of Court Order, by manipulation of the Court, utilizing a disgusting pre-conceived plan to be introduced and implemented, which equates to planned obstruction of justice by an officer of the Court – himself, Christopher Wayland!
Mr. Wayland continued to compound his disgusting behaviour, undermining the sanctity of the Court, during the recorded decision to conduct “a Without Prejudice conference” with the Courtroom emptied of everyone, bar His Honour Cas Herold, himself, Christopher Wayland, and yours truly, Bill Manderson.
This conference’s legitimacy will be a “bone of contention” during the upcoming Contempt of Court charge against me Motions Hearing, scheduled for Superior Court at 9:30 AM Tuesday 9th March 2010. For the record Webbers, I shall verbally assure the Judge that I will file a defense. With truth as my indestructible weapon of defense, and my trust and faith in the truth of matters, I am confident of success against this “remedy of last resort,” as planned, back in May 2009, for application! They will fail against truth and my deep faith in the Judicial System! I shall prevail! Good must defeat evil, and I believe, as described very eloquently in the Guelph Mercury this past week, “I am passionate and utterly convinced I am on “the side of the angels” in disputes I see as greater than Court matters and myself.” It could not have been said better! I thank the Mercury staff. God bless Webbers.
PS. Onward into battle, not to lose! Good over evil, and driven by truth! (Beat that!)

February 27th, 2010 - The Power of Truth
Let us take but a moment to reflect upon the power of truth and how it relates to the players in the unfolding drama of: Libel suits, Peace Bond applications, Libel law legal interpretations, unprofessional lawyer behaviour per the Law Society of Upper Canada and violations of the Rules of Civil Procedure by lawyers (et al).
The massive deterioration of civil behaviour in our matters with Wellington County Council (et al) should be a very disturbing and concerning issue at this juncture, with far reaching consequences to all of the collateral victims of “the fringes” being sucked into the vortex! Why is this? To put all of this in perspective, we have to go back to October 28th, 2008 and refer to the McCarthy Tétrault Letter of Intent to sue for libel, and make reference to our posting of this letter and our response, dated Thursday January 8th 2009. 2009 Webbers, which was the kick-off date, which generated a simultaneously 2 (two) prong attack, as planned by design by McCarthy Tétrault, at that time confusingly “obscure” in their strategy plan to file simultaneously a Civil Trial process and a Peace Bond. This was done, as I say, by design, for the purpose to keep me off balance in the major Civil Trial for libel, with the Peace Bond as a decoy and distraction. I say distraction as, per our recent Peace Bond Hearing, we go to Trial originally on the 7,8 and 9 of December (now revised to August 3, see the Guelph Mercury report posted here for your reading pleasure).
You see, the McCarthy plan, which in essence nullifies the effect of the Peace Bond, that frivolous and vexatious, irresponsible, planned waste of Court time, all paid for at a rate of $1,000/per hour, of billable hours to McCarthy Tétrault, at 100% cost to the Wellington County taxpayers. How’s them apples Webbers? 100% cost with absolutely no chance of any return to the taxpayer! At this time you are already on the hook for half a Million dollars to McCarthy Tétrault, and increasing daily! The original December Court cluster of dates, how did that happen? Here is the truth Webbers, all in the public record if you care to look for the truth, that elusive power which generates revelations and enlightenment. “And He said let there be light” – indeed, let there be light!
Webbers, we’re taught “truth is light.” I very much believe this observation, which has been realized by humanity over the eons since we have walked upright upon this beautiful earth, the planet we continue to abuse, but still fights back in her own way. Maybe we should listen for a change, we’ve become a society of talkers, opinionated to the level of assuming we are consistently correct – such folly!
In the unreported submission I made before Judge Hourigan, in the C.C.L.A. Motions matter, I addressed, in my 40 minutes of time, following the disgusting, insulting to the Court, obvious filibuster for 3 hours plus from Wayland, (I cannot address him as mister), many relevant points, which were noted in the judgment endorsement. They are, the points, on record, for public consideration, as printed in the official transcripts, which I can use in my defense! I intend to do just that! My adversaries are aware of their irretrievable errors, on record, in the transcripts! Webbers, “they are done like dinner.”
Subsequent to all of the Court happenings of the past few weeks, the parties find themselves in a “Mexican standoff!” This time McCarthy Tétrault brought an arrogant “knife to a gunfight!” Silly boys!
Remember Webbers, I am the defendant in these matters, all of these matters, the burden of proof is on my accusers – the “so-called” plaintiffs, who ever the hell they are!
Now Webbers, can you now understand the importance of truth in these matters? He who holds the truth, and importantly, can prove the truth, holds the trial! And as the defendant, with the irrefutable evidence, supported by many professional sound minds of high repute, I must assume a degree of confidence! Doug Thomson – the next move is yours; your “bully process” has no place in what’s to come! You cannot recuse yourself, your Firm’s reputation is now on the line and in full view, nationally; not the kind of publicity your Firm would prefer, not with Diane LaCalamita, that “12 Million Dollar Baby,” in the wings! “Your move Duggie!”
Webbers, God bless and keep on webbin’.

February 21st, 2010 - Served Again
           Hi Webbers, welcome back to the land of OZ (a.k.a. Wellington County). The “Wizard” has been up to his old tricks again, making terrifying noises and hissing steam!
            This County Council, and its taxpayer funded McCarthy Tétrault legal advisors ($500,000 and counting), have done it again! Guess what – I have been served again with a, quote “amended/amended/amended Motion.” That’s 3 (three) in one year on the Libel file, and guess what? They are “proposing” I look at an offer to dismiss this case against me. Oh, it’s “dressed up” to appear like another “consideration” for me to “see a way out of” my “problem” of being sued by these overly assured individuals. Sheer gall and stupidity!!
            Here’s the deal as “suggested” in this “camouflaged” pant pooping attempt by Mr. Doug Thomson, advising this so-called bunch of public servants (Wellington County Council), that recent events have changed dramatically the current playing field, in this “self-created” shambles that this group is now facing! They have lost – no doubt! Not only that, McCarthy Tétrault themselves have, through their blind greed, in the pursuit of “maximum billable hours” have, by design, injured the Court during the legal proceedings and now face at least 2 (two) Motions of Censure which I shall file against them. That is bad enough Webbers, but they have tried, in vain, and transparency, to cover them up! Not only is this behaviour unbecoming, it is a violation of the very laws they, as a firm and individually, have sworn to uphold, before the Canadian Bar! Unforgivable!! Can greed blind people this much? Apparently yes! They know what awaits them when they return to Superior Court! Censure, supported by irrefutable evidence, filed with the Court! Read the transcripts from the Motions Hearing, before the Honourable Justice Cas Herold, in Guelph on May 6th, 2009. It’s on the public record on page #20, lines #24/25, and page #21, lines #1 through #18, plus more! What a mess!
            Now as you all know, Justice Herold agreed with my request to “stay” the Proceedings until the C.C.L.A. Intervention Motion was heard and decided! This has long past, with the results on the record, i.e. Motion denied! What now, you say? Mexican standoff, I say! In a situation like this I would have consulted my teenage years “oracle” – my grandfather, and thus enquire. “What do you think of all this, Pop?” He would reply in his broad Scottish brogue terminology – “Hoors and comic singers, Wullie, hoors and comic singers!” And you know Webbers; he would be “right on.” Hoors and comic singers indeed!!
            To close I wish to detail the pathetic attempts of my adversaries to salvage any minute element of credibility, minute being better than none! But none is what they will have, once the dust has settled and cold reality returns to the unclouded scene. How is this for the latest pathetic proposal from this increasingly panicky and desperate individuals:

1. Mr. Manderson, we have removed the $2.4 Million dollars from our amended/amended statement of claim plus

2. If you pay the Plaintiff’s claim of 0$ (zero dollars) plus $1000 (one thousand dollars) for costs, you may move to have the Proceeding dismissed! And

3. Not only that, if you believe the $1000 (one thousand dollars) costs is excessive, you can pay the costs of 0$ (zero dollars) plus $400 (four hundred dollars) and have the costs assessed by the Court for a total of $400.00 (four hundred dollars). And

4. Not only that, per line 80 on page #51, and I quote, “However, in light of the defendant’s personal circumstances (no money) the Plaintiff’s are only seeking $1.00 (one dollar) (TRAP)! Wow! All this with a new total of $401.00 (four hundred and one dollars). How about them apples Webbers!

Oh, and another thing Webbers, just a thought, could we expect, as a part of this generous “Christian offer”, would McCarthy Tétrault waive the $500,00 plus of taxpayers retainer money, if I were to accept this incredible offer! Will they return the $500,000 back to the Wellington County taxpayers? What do you think Webbers – Let’s hear from you! Give me a break!!
For the record, I shall file a Form 18B Notice of Intent to Defend, and, with the contempt for this amended Statement of Claim’s offer, on the record I say, “Stick it up your nose” – See you in Court! I am not for sale, don’t you get it yet, Thomson! This County ship of fools have exposed their chronic stupidity to a level even I thought was surely not attainable! This is our civic leadership? They all must go in October, it’s up to you voters; got the guts to do what needs to be done? We shall see!
The summer will bring with it the inglorious truth, now what are you made of, Webbers and voters? Take back your County! Purge this cancer!! Keep webbin’ Webbers – God bless.

January 2nd, 2010 - Looking Closer at the C.C.L.A. Motions Hearing of December 14th 2009
Happy New Year Webbers! From all of us to all of you, we wish you all (except our adversaries), all the very best of good health and good fortune for 2010 – our predicted “banner year.”
On March 20th 2010 we celebrate our 10th anniversary and we plan to do it in style! Wow, 10 years and still getting stronger! (Is there a message here?)
As we all now know 1 (one) judge, the Honourable William Hourigan, issued his decision with reference to the C.C.L.A.’s Intervention Motion Hearing, heard before his Court on 14th December 2009, in Guelph. A copy of the Judge’s decision is posted as a pdf file for access by our Webbers – click here. It is a very clearly stated opinion of the Judge, called upon to consider the submitted Motion on the narrow points of law, identified by Mr. Ryder Gilliland on behalf of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
At this time of posting it would be inappropriate of me to comment on the considerations to be made by the C.C.L.A., subsequent to their considerations of Justice Hourigan’s detailed endorsement for content and acceptability, which would determine their response if decided applicable. This, of course, would be conducted with a consultation with Mr. Ryder Gilliland, their retained counsel of record. Standard professional protocol Webbers, and this group of people, I assure you, exude and demonstrate this protocol, as was witnessed by me, and all others in attendance in Court on 14th December 2009. Mr. Gilliland conducted himself with a professional and highly commendable manner, in his submissions. It was my pleasure to observe a time controlled, truly professional presentation, which has gone a long way to alleviate my recently acquired sense of cynism towards the so-called “legal profession” and how “they” behave in the application of their contribution to the “must be” revered justice system of our great country Canada! At least here we had, in my opinion and observation, professionalism returned to the Court system, and for that I say, “Thank you Mr. Ryder Gilliland, you did your profession proud.”
Webbers, I would draw your attention to the “wording” used by Justice Hourigan in his endorsement, attached as a pdf, for your viewing pleasure and interpretation. To this report I would draw your attention to page #4, paragraph 14, in which the Justice makes reference to my submission to the Court, of having filed no materials on this Motion. The reason is well known, as stated, this was not my Motion, I believe I have made that quite clear, as is on the record in Justice Cas Herold’s Court, hearing the Motions Court arguments in the Libel Suit! With respect, the only correlation between that case, at present stayed, and the C.C.L.A’s submitted Intervention Motion is this Hearing’s subject matter, no more, no less!
Now Webbers, you must be advised that the newspaper report, only one, from the Guelph Mercury, by design, and with considerable reason for withholding, at that time, possibly justified, the full text of my referred to quote by the Judge on page #4, paragraph 14: “He did, however, make very helpful oral submissions on the Motion” etc. I believe my very helpful oral submissions, fully texted on the formal Court transcripts, were made to bring to the attention to the Judge just why Mr. Wayland had “Put the Court to sleep” by the introduction of a “whining filibuster”, of 3 hours duration, to attempt to introduce the Superior Court Libel case evidence into this non related Hearing, all as predicted by me. This “alleged” lawyer is so transparent, through his arrogance, made again, a complete fool of himself in front of the Judge, his peers and the attending public. I won’t elaborate at this juncture as this is all on the record, in the transcripts, for full public disclosure. This guy is in deep trouble, in my humble submission. Oh my, not again Mr. Wayland, this is getting monotonous! An add-on to the next step, before Justice Cas Herold, well, maybe you will be spared, for some time, whilst we consider Chief Justice McLaghlan’s Supreme Court ruling of 21/22nd December 2009. Another “candie” for Smelly-Welly.com which will not be questioned, but immediately considered for total applicability in re-structuring my defense on all matters before Criminal and Superior Court. You couldn’t make this up! You see now Webbers, why I am a man of faith! We will now take the “candie” (another one) and apply it to the work in process (W.I.P.)!
Just remember Webbers, the C.C.L.A. were representing all of us, even the cognizant dissonant taxpayers of Wellington County who are on the hook right now for an estimated $500,000 in legal fees to cover the McCarthy Tétrault costs to date and we’re still in Motions Court! Still a long way to go, and for what? I was clear in my initial question to Judge Hourigan in his Court, I asked, “Your Honour, why are we here today?” The start of my referred to “very helpful oral submissions.” The upcoming few weeks will shed the “brilliant light” of enlightenment in all these matters. So let us attend to the business at hand. We did promise you truth, Webbers. Ready yourselves for receipt! God bless.

December 26th, 2009 - Merry Christmas To You and Yours from Me and Mine
Ho! Ho! Ho! Webbers, merry Christmas (I am a Christian) and to my fellow men, women and children, whatever your “faith related” persuasions, may the “spirit of Christmas” bless all of us!
This week, I swear Webbers, I was blessed with the joy, held since childhood, of, at long last (74 years), I learned the true identity of Santa Clause! (With an “e”). Yes Webbers, (but don’t tell the children), on Monday the 14th of December, 2009, in Civil Court in Guelph, I learned the true identity of the jolly old man, (no red suit or flowing beard), but because of his gift bearing visit and generosity. I know, I have been blessed and am so overjoyed in my heart that I must share his identity “between we girls,” you know what I mean! Nudge, nudge, wink, wink! Ho! Ho! Ho! Santa’s real identity is cleverly concealed behind the façade of ethic, decency, honour and integrity (et al) in the “form” of a person posing as a lawyer, you know, a member of the legal profession, or whatever they call it know, after Monday, 14th of December 2009! What a disgrace Webbers and adversaries, what an affront! Santa has been, all along, Mr. Christopher Wayland, on the record, for now, a very well known “champion of civil rights,” having been retained previously by the C.C.L.A. Whoa, wait a minute, you mean our C.C.L.A.? Really? “Oh yeah, and he won his case!” Wow! What happened, what has changed this individual, that he would behave now as he does? You are entitled to ask folks!
Maybe, upon reading this report, he could rake-up some semblance of “the Scottish perception of manhood,” and then challenge my observations, after all, Mr. Wayland, the last time I looked we Canadian people live under a democratic law, you remember, Magna Carta, stuff like that! But you know Webbers, I must apologize to you all, even Wayland, as a professed Christian, I have “not turned the other cheek!” (Most difficult, but I will not succumb to anger, well, at least for the “spirit of goodwill” season. Wayland, you should really “thank the Lord.” You know what I mean!
For now “Santa Wayland,” thank you for your gifts which I received from you on Monday December 14th, 11 days early, but none the less received by me through your “gesture of giving” – I’m humbled! Merry Christmas Santa Wayland, (your secret is safe with me, oh yeah!)
I’ll give you my gift for Easter, you know, that “other” celebration of the death, Webbers – conclusion of the rant, and, for now, to follow up with “justification details” which set me on today’s theme in our report, that theme being “human decency and co-related self respect,” and respect for others! (If earned.) No value otherwise!
Webbers, it was very “refreshing” for me to witness “ a professional performance” from a “professional lawyer,” having been deprived of that for so long, only having performance exposure to date to the “modus operendi” of the “alleged” top Canadian firm of McCarthy Tétrault (et al). Mr. Ryder Gilliland was the conveyor to me of all that I had perceived lost, in the legal profession, an opinion I believe, has been permitted to be the common perception out there in “Citizen Apathy land” – a very serious debilitating creeping paralysis which can ultimately destroy our democracy, (in my humble opinion).
Mr. Gilliland was smooth, focused and articulate in his 45-minute presentation to the Court, of his argument related to why we are here, Your Honour! Excellent and inspiring, without phony dramatics, in the usage of his clearly pointed vocabulary, used to express himself, precisely on point to, I believe, the full satisfaction of His Honour, Justice Hourigan, who ran a professional and very efficient Hearing, with a flair that would have silenced all of those skeptics and doom and gloom advocates of the idea “you can’t trust anyone anymore!” You missed an opportunity to be enlightened, thank you Your Honour! Irrespective of your final decision, good job – well done!
Now we address our adversary, the self-proclaimed “Toronto lawyer,” (yes Webbers, before Justice Herold in February – “Good morning Your Honour, my name is Christopher Wayland and I am a Toronto lawyer” – Wow!!) Really? You mean “a Toronto lawyer?” From day one this individual has exposed his “Achilles heel”, i.e. his supreme arrogance. We are honoured, yes honoured, to be in “his” presence, we of “the lowly provincial” status of intelligence and experience in the practice of law? What was it Shakespeare had said “Now we’re in power, the first thing we will do…etc) – Webbers, Wayland would probably look for a way for a way to further sue me if I completed this particular Shakespearian quotation! He tried to set it up again on Monday, attempting to try, in this Motions Court, the matter before Justice Herold’s Court, stayed, stayed as on the record, per the Herold Court transcripts of May 6th 2009, copy submitted to this Hearing! Webbers, we have read the newspaper report of Ms. Thana Dharmarajah, published on December 15th, 2009. Understandably Ms. Dharmarajah could not have possibly reported every detail of the Hearing. Much has been left unreported, I assume, for the reasons which the C.C.L.A. intervened in this matter, i.e. sensitivity by the press to avoid any chance of being sued for libel. This was a classic example of the critical point, which Mr. Borovoy and Ms. Abby Deshman, a fine “young lady” lawyer, and all of the C.C.L.A. team, were making before the Court, on behalf of every man, woman and child in Canada! This is all about your freedoms under the law. In this instance I only served as a catalyst, it could have been any one of you! Webbers, it is most, most important that we all understand that it is about all of us. Every one of us! I have to tell you all sincerely, I am so proud of having been a catalyst to enable the C.C.L.A. to, once more, challenge their interpreted violation of a persons civil rights, under the law! The only downside to the day was that the Courtroom was almost empty! Those of you who choose to go through life; oblivious to what is really going on around you, being ignored by your lack of civic sense of responsibility, is very sad! People, caring people, made this system work on Monday 14th December 2009 and none of you witnessed the process, the Court was empty – I say shame! Your public apathy, if permitted to continue, by us all, will surely greatly impact our democracy! This is your fight to fight, don’t leave it to a 74 year old “creaking door!” Get involved for the love of God! Get involved, raise your voice and shout “No More!” Challenge the wrongs, which are clearly visible! Correct them, it is your responsibility – “You are your brother’s keeper.” Ignore Cain! Just do it! It is time! Consider yourselves having received the last “ass kicking” I shall inflict! I’m peed off, (end of rant)!
Never anger a Scot, they will prove to you the rumors are true – we are unrelenting, mean s.o.b.’s. Believe it and just watch! By virtue of our great respect for the legal system, and everything it stands for, Smelly-Welly.com will make no further comment of this matter until we have had a chance to examine the Honourable Justice Hourigan’s verdict and the official transcripts are available for public “consumption.” I promise you “a feast” irrespective of the final verdict, as we will explain later, as we go forward to the Justice we have planned! We are motivated!
We recognize, with deep appreciation, the excellent work done, on all our behalves by Mr. Alan Borovoy and Ms. Abby Deshman, both of the C.C.L.A. and, of course, Mr. Ryder Gilliland, who I believe optimizes the “charter” of the C.C.L.A.; a fine young man with, predictably, a great future in civil law. Keep an eye out for this man, his head will not be “turned” by narcissism, that self-destructive, all too prominent, plague, which is “deeply rooted” in the daily exposure of lawyers who are oblivious to their own condition, arrogance driven and guaranteed to end in self destruction. Something like the “Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fairest of us all?” If the cap fits, wear it! I think you Webbers get my drift. Keep on webbing and talking. God bless!

November 30th 2009
Oh Webbers, what a week! In the tradition of the Wagnerian dramatics, we, this week, commenced the witnessing of Wellington County Council’s “Gotterdammerung – Twilight of the Gods” as they proceeded to self-destruct in a performance which would have “deeply moved” any “Wagnerian Opera Lover!” Whitcombe’s pathetic justification of (2) bidders for the “Architect business” (Puslinch libraries) lucrative, very lucrative, and, of course, the “confrontational exchange” between Councillor Maieron and our “predictably acclaimed for 2010” Warden “Ross Screwie” when she, in her dictatorial power crazed mind, decided to single handedly “violate” the County Procedural By-laws, when she decided that the standard, acceptable agenda line item of “Other Business” was no longer “permissible” in her Chamber, (in my opinion she spends too much time in her “chamber”, contemplating all kinds of screwie things). No By-law amendments to be determined by Council vote? No, way, do we not understand she is Warden? Of course our “woosie Councillors” just sat back in silence and watched the show! 2010 is going to be a show! Looking at Ross-Zuj’s pedigree, since her emergence from the wilderness of Centre Wellington politics, one has to wonder, “Where has she been hiding all this time?” Two years as a rookie Councillor, never in that time a Committee Chair, (well, this year will be Chris White’s first!) But Ross-Zuj went on to emulate Linda Carter by extending her arms horizontally to the side, spinning rotationally three times, wearing a new pant suit and dressed as Wonder Warden!! Magic!! (Or something) Oh my! Oh my!
And John Green, the smooth veteran, who classically set up Chris White for Chair of AF & P, by announcing after Chris’s declaration of bid for AF & P Chair, that he, John Green, has decided not to seek a second term of AF & P Chair – well, certainly not for 2010! Cool Hand Green – Brilliant! Learn from the pro Chris! With Broomhead, this year “looking to be taken in from the cold,” it will be amusing to see where he sells his soul this time! Remember 2009 Mike? You wouldn’t listen to reason!
Well Webbers, the sudden removal from grace and office of County Clerk, you know, Donna Van Wyck, this will open up all kinds of speculation, but for now, even we will not be tempted to comment! I think we all know why! December/January and March Court dates may just have something to do with that decision. What do you think Webbers – Twilight of the Gods? Gotterdammerung??? Only time will tell, as the strains of Wagnerian climax fades into the “sounds of silence.” Go figure Webbers. God bless.

November 28th, 2009
Welcome back Webbers. The 23rd of November is a date that we at Smelly-Welly.com will recognize as “Revelation day” for the confirmation of our long sought “Evidence Package”, analysis check for validity of content and accuracy of fact. What we witnessed by attending the November 23rd, 2009 Wellington County Council Meeting of that day has sealed the extent of our Investigations in support of our accusations of Municipal Corruption in the Council Chamber, and beyond.
We have enough evidence to get a conviction, of that I am certain, and with the enlightened support and co-operation of the Wellington County O.P.P., and their excellent team of detectives, we shall rip back the veneer of concealment which has been very successful, until now, in solidly concealing the corruptive activities which were hidden beneath! Those days are now over, and John Green, you can now relax with this notice – you will no longer have to “Wish you would hurry up, Manderson.” Before Hiram (et al) and you know it! You had (2) years; we gave you (2) years to do it yourself but you didn’t have the “testicular” strength to do so – you big woosie! You let many people down Brother Green, but mostly yourself. I hope you can live with it, as each time our eyes meet, (less frequently recently); your conscience will remind you of your lack of courage. In that, you are not alone in County Council! Shameful!
Case in point, as predicted, the human punch bag, Warden Ross-Zuj, has been set up for a second year as “cannon fodder.” The silly girl still can’t see it, well, what can you expect from supreme arrogance? She believes her own assessment of her skill level, and with sincere re-assurance from her “puppet masters” in Council, that she is the greatest thing since sliced bread! How stupidly “naïve” can you be? Warden, put in this position for a second time to hopefully permit the explosive shells aimed at the County, to “bounce” harmlessly off your “broad shoulders” or whatever! So obvious to everyone except the wearer of  “The Emperor’s new clothes.” How are you looking now Joanne? Take a good look in the mirror and ask, “D’uh, am I missing something here?” Not nice of me Webbers? Then try walking a mile in my shoes!
All of these people have destroyed, without care at all, the lives of many innocent senior citizens, many of whom I still represent, and still will be heard for their demands of Justice, for crimes committed against them! This is also my motivation, and my adversaries know it well, in the most minute detail! Here we come! All of your victims, and we will have Justice! Be assured!
Hmmm…Nobody seems interested in the Warden’s job, we wonder why, can’t be the money, as we all know, per the prophetic words of the 1980’s London pop group appropriately named “Dire Straits”, who prophetically wrote, (and we ad lib here), “That’s not working, that’s the way you do it! Working as a Councillor on the W.C.C., that ain’t working, that’s the way you do it, money for nothing and the chicks for free!” How prophetic! And they call it a Health Club? Well, whatever! Green Legacy, River Run Concerts (with dinner), Whistler family outings and other extracurricular activities, all at the expense of the dumb Taxpayer? Ah well – apathy, go figure!
What was it again that Walter Traschel asked of another Councillor when discussing the merits of the Green Legacy program across Canada…“Is this just another excuse for him to spend a night in a hotel room with the little girl?” I wonder who he is referring to, maybe I’ll ask him, what do you think Webbers? I did warn you, it will get ugly!
Webbers, per our planned strategy around the timing of our information releases, it seems acceptable per analysis of your hits stats, that you seem to support it, so we will, under separate reporting, build on the excellent reporting of recent events by our colleague in arms, Mr. Scott Tracey of the Guelph Mercury newspaper, who continues to report accurately, and fairly, the issues and events of political importance to the interested reader on the subject of “local politics.” He is not deterred from his responsibilities to enlighten, despite Councillor Robert Wilson’ opinion and expressed observation that “The public couldn’t give a rat’s ass about Municipal politics.” But wait Mr. Tracey, the oracle Wilson stated on Monday November 23rd that what he really meant was, “We in Council do everything for the Taxpayer, they don’t have to care!” I swear to God that’s what the man said, and he knows I have it on tape!
We shall, in the upcoming weeks, address Mr. Tracey’s reports, posted on the Guelph Mercury on Tuesday 24th of November 2009. Keep webbing Webbers; we’re reaching crescendo on the 14th of December 2009, in Court to hear the Canadian Civil Liberties Association Civil Rights Intervention Motion on behalf of all of us in Canada! Should be very interesting!
PS. McCarthy Tétrault will be funded, even at this Hearing, by you the Taxpayer, compliments of Wellington County Council, the real true Plaintiffs in all matters, before the Courts, Superior and Criminal! Not peed off yet? Boy, you guys are easy pickings! God bless.

November 22nd, 2009
Hi Webbers, frisky this morning! Have just been recently served, at your great cost, another attempt by the bad guys (including the pathetically pseudo-professional law firm of McCarthy Tétrault, who’s cannon fodder associates continue to “take the bullet” for the big guys). As an “old guy” I find it sad to see “young talent” abused this way. But then, it will “all come out in the wash” of the Courtroom, we can all be sure of that! “It is destined to be” as is my faith in my journey to Justice! And all “the silly and arrogant little boys and girls” who believe me not are in for a terrible shock, one from which they will never recover! No more Mr. Nice Guy!! Never try to screw a true Scot!
This latest attempt (click here) by McCarthy Tétrault’s “expendable associate” Mr. (young Mister) Steven Tanner, “in social life” probably known to his friends as a nice young man, has been for me, (an “experienced” father, manager, “friend of young people”, (I used to be one)), a most troubling example of exploitation of one so young, by one so arrogant! I ask myself “What is the annual casualty rate of initially “eager” McCarthy Tétrault associates?” Maybe, with patience, we can learn the truth from the upcoming Court matter of Ms. Diane LaCalamita versus McCarthy Tétrault (she’s only suing for $12 Million – and she has a lawyer!) Maybe I should increase my cross-claim against the County of Wellington County (et al) from $6 Million to $12 Million, then maybe I’ll be able to attract a law firm like Shield’s O’Donnel MacKillop L.L.P. with, of course, no disrespect to Mr. Ryder Gillaland of Blake’s, that fine ethical professional law firm!
To refocus at this time, I shall, per my previous process, share with you all the latest “documentation” received from McCarthy Tétrault who, per the “latest” inserted attempt to confuse, submitted Affidavits from the “alleged” Plaintiffs, Whitcombe and Wilson of Wellington County (et al). They must be “smoking dope.” This is transparency at its best, thank you for the “candy!” It get more bizarre!
McCarthy Tétrault is still trying to claim I have violated the subject Court Order, per the Hearing before Justice Cas Herold, on Wednesday, May 6th of 2009, and to the expendable Mr. Tanner, I would offer up the words of my grandfather, chastising me thus, “Eh telt ye, ye canna hae fun until yer homework’s feenished. Dae it now, or I’ll kick yer erse!” (Such eloquence!)
I’ll be waiting for you, or any one of your McCarthy Tétrault bullies. You cannot scare me with genuine threats! And, as yet, you still suck the blood of the stupid people of Wellington County, sadly of which there are many, but take heart, all will be well, for you see, you may fool some of the people some of the time, or even most of the people most of the time, but never all of the people all of the time! See you in Court, your bully days are over! Fondest regards.

November 14, 2009 - Further Evidence that Desperation in Fast Becoming the Watchword of the Day
Hi Webbers. Not so long ago, out of respect for Judge Cas Herold, we removed from our website many things related to our ongoing legal proceedings, including the Affidavits of Scott Wilson and Brad Whitcombe. Just recently we have received several letters from an increasingly desperate McCarthy Tétrault which we will now post for your viewing pleasure and understanding. The first of these is a revised set of Affidavits which you can click here to view. Just to compare we also include the original Affidavits for you to look at. For Brad Whitcombe's Affidavit click here and to read Scott Wilson's, click here. We invite you to compare and contrast the two documents and the direction that they are clearly taking.

September 16th, 2009 - F.O.I. Request Response and a Request to Councillor John Green for Help
To: Mr. John Green, Wellington County Councillor
From: Mr. Bill Manderson, Smelly-Welly.com
Dear Councillor Green;
Ref: Attached F.O.I. response from County Clerk Ms. Donna Van Wyck, to attached F.O.I. request. (copied) Your file #2009-8
Sir, may I please impose on your well earned reputation as the senior statesman on political procedural adherence, consolidated by your Chairmanship of the Administration, Finance and Personnel Committee, and request of you, your administrative intervention as a County Councillor, to enable my formally submitted Freedom of Information request.
I refer to the attached response from County Clerk, Ms. Donna Van Wyck, to my original request of Council via registered mail with conformance of receipt, from Canada Post, of the date August 19th at 11:59 am (for the record).
If I may continue, I submit my request requirements were clearly defined. The County Clerk is not a 16 year old, recent school leaver in her first job. The Clerk is the senior staff member, administrating the “other” lady staff members of the Clerk’s office, (note: not referred to as the C.A.O.’s office, although we all know, in fairness to Ms. Wyck, it should be! What do you think?). If I may refer to the County response document (click here)!

1. It is a fee estimate
2. It depicts a requirement of 2 hours for locating (11) documents at a charge of $30 per hour. A copy charge of .20¢ per copy x 11= $2.20 total.

Now John, if I may be so bold as to address you as such, we are, I believe, by extensive experience, entitled to consider ourselves having passed that point of suffering “the impetuosity of youth,” culminating in the uncomfortable exposure of stupidity! You and I, I believe, share the common belief that charity is the greatest virtue given to man! John, this is the last time I shall extend my charity to Wellington County Council! If you require a detailed explanation, you have my phone number! This stupidity thrust upon a silly big girl, is typical and expected from this organization.
The tail wags the dog John, you and I, and many lesser men and women know it also! It is time for this to be stopped. John, for the record, I shall pay the fee estimate of $62.20 but, also for the record, do not in any way agree to the process applied, nor the financials identified. I do this to physically include these (11), identified by number only, documents as an integral part of my evidentiary package in support of my Court identified Intent to Sue Wellington County Council (et al) for Municipal Corruption and Violations of Criminal Code Section 122, of course, at this date, subsequent to the C.C.L.A. Motions Hearing set for December 15th (with no expected Motions for Deferral, again, from McCarthy Tétrault, on Wellington County Council’s behalf, inclusive of the as yet alleged Plaintiffs – Whitcombe and Wilson).
Mr. Green, we both know you are very cognitive of your situation and position in these matters, you have people ready to catch you when you will inevitable fall, but don’t wait until it’s too late, we can’t stick around, and will not stick around, much longer!
Regards,
Bill Manderson

September 8th - The response from County Clerk Ms. Donna Van Wyck arrives...
Oh Webbers, Webbers, Webbers, what can I say, dumb and dumber (one person) is alive and well, being paid with a big buck at Taxpayers expense, hiding under the guise of County Clerk in Wellington County, a top 100 Canadian employer, we’re forever being reminded! Well, as a, 74 year old retired engineering manager of more years than I dare admit, it has been a very constant painful observation to me, seeing insecure people believing that “blind allegiance” to a bully was the protection they needed to offset their insecurities! With Ms. Van Wyck, we have the classic personified example.
Let’s just take a minute to reflect on this important issue, brought to light by the pathetic behaviour of our County Clerk, a well-paid position of Senior Staff authority, reporting into, dare I say it? The County C.A.O. Scott Wilson, who has an existing track record of bully behaviour. This will be confirmed by witnesses at the upcoming Libel trial, against me, Bill Manderson. I doubt if the ladies in the Clerk’s Office go to the bathroom without his permission! Well, maybe not that far, but we seem to run through staff, good people – I wonder why? Are we not happy? Only the connected, who will take edicts without question? They historically are the “mousey ladies” who just take it all and tell themselves, “Never mind, only 25 ears to go, to get my gold watch” – Next! This is his “happy ship,” well, as we see it! Paid big bucks – “Keep your mouth shut and your opinions to yourself!” Remember the wisdom of the “Oracles of 1960’s” psychologists Lennon and McCartney, when they reminded us all that “money can’t buy me love.” Think about it, nothing is worth the cost of selling your soul and your self-respect. Enter on cue our County Clerk, Ms. Donna Van Wyck (God help her).
My F.O.I. request (copy below) clearly lays out my detailed documentation sought! I also critically identified specifically an Index of Record. After a time lapse of 2 weeks from receipt of my request, on the 2nd of September 2009, Ms. Van Wyck issued a response in the form of an estimated of fees which makes no reference to the details of, now wait for it, (11) “copies.”(Click here to view) Is that (11) documents inferred in your estimate? Also reading on, and this it where it gets really stupid, Ms. Van Wyck, you indicate a “Search and copy time” of 2 hours at $30 per hour.
Are you on narcotics Ms. Van Wyck? To establish your file content of (11) pages, I would submit you have performed your search. Did it take 2 hours to locate (11) pages of an open financial record? Ms. Van Wyck, now let’s get real here, Wellington County are very quick to remind the public that they have earned the right to be recognized as one of the top 100 employers in Canada! God save us all, Ms. Van Wyck, things are worse than we thought! And you thought Rick Mercer could rant! (After all, he’s only another apathetic Canadian, right Mr. Borovoy?)
You know Webbers, I think I will talk with Inspector Scott Smith of the O.P.P. to ask if he would be interested to consider the situation to be applied as a “suitability” test, to ask an interested candidate for detective school application to the O.P.P. Well, maybe not, I would not insult Inspector Smith’s intelligence, not as much as Ms. Van Wyck’s insult to all of our intelligence. This is a Senior Staff Member who has, as directed, responded by appending her signature to the document, assuming ownership and protecting again – “Teflon Scott.” Ms. Van Wyck, blind allegiance is “self destructive!” You’ve been used again! How does it feel now Donna?
You will be questioned in Court, in the upcoming Libel trial against me – please take this as a Notice of Intent – it is! See you in Court, young lady.
Bill Manderson
PS. Oh Webbers, I don’t pay for anything twice, that’s why I’m in Court to establish the (11) identified documents you had to search for Ms. Van Wyck! To utilize a direct overhead labour cost, I would argue, should be your primary goal, not to mention your responsibility to the Taxpayer; that forgotten, ignored source of the funding you choose to abuse!! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!!

August 11 - F.O.I. Request filed with County Clerk Ms. Donna Van Wyck
Dear Ms. Van Wyck
Re: F.O.I. Request enclosed pertaining to requested information from your files related to the (2) Court Cases, reference Whitcombe/Wilson versus Manderson, both Civil and Criminal, currently before Court
Attached, and duly funded, by my submission of a $5.00 TD/CT Money Order, I wish to apply our standard protocol of structured request, starting with your issued Index of Record format, to identify your records on file, and of the total identified listings, which files will be readily released to the R.L.G., and which will not, identifying the Section of the F.O.I. Rulings you wish to apply to deny access to the arguable Public documents.

1. At this time I request we focus on the invoices submitted by the firm of McCarthy Tétrault detailing in line format, each chargeable hour of legal representation, by which lawyer, for what service, and, of course, the applicable financial charges totaled for payment.
2. The calendarisation of invoices received, from McCarthy Tétrault related, and the past and ongoing recordings at the date of your collation and issuance of record.
3. A total accurate listing of those individual County Councillors who voted for Councillor Chris White’s Motion to Proceed to Sue, as admitted to me by Councillor Chris White.

Please accept this request as a Phase 1 requirement to facilitate the timely progression of the ongoing Court Case, requested by your Council, with a focused, strongly worded requirement for expediency, verbalized by your retained lawyer, Christopher Wayland, of McCarthy Tétrault. We also are in favour of utmost expedience, being applied, but of course, with one eye on the 15th December C.C.L.A. Hearing.
We await your requested expedient response to this F.O.I. Request.

August 10th- 2009 - A little history to explain how we ended up where we are.
Hi Webbers, and all of our website active adversaries, boy you guys are blowing our number of hits recently! We now have set down a pre-trial date of September 15th at 10 am, at which time we shall share, before the Court, how I shall respond to the Criminal Peace Bond application brought down on me by the alleged “Plaintiffs” Wilson and Whitcombe! Things are moving along “quite satisfactorily” thanks very much. We’ll keep you current when applicable!
Continuing our dedication promise to you all, our loyal and supportive readers, we now expand our already busy radar screen of issues, with the addition of (2) very seriously acknowledged issues, factually supported by sworn testimony from very credible witness and enabled by equally credible evidence, to facilitate the inevitable investigations of our law enforcement professionals of the O.P.P., and their Federal counterparts! The crimes do violate Federal law, (we believe).
Let us look at the Wellington County Planning Committee, inclusive of what should be a stand alone Land Division Committee. We shall address the legal structure pre-requisite, per law, as we proceed!
In the year 2000, the structure of this long standing, efficiently run “Ad Hoc Committee” of the Land Division, (L.D.C.), was dramatically changed by the coinciding events of the L.D.C. Chairman of (3) years term, Mr. David Sharpe, having served out his term in the Chair, and the “first term Warden” Brad Whitcombe, Councillor and Mayor of Puslinch Township. Assuming the “chain of office”, all pre-planned by the Wellington County Star Chamber, headed up by Councillor Archie MacRobbie (a.k.a. MacRobbery), William Adsett (former Warden and publisher of the Wellington Advertiser Newspaper), Bruce Barton, Councillor who died in office, Jim Connell (former Warden) and their lieutenants of the day who will be named, when applicable.
The level of corruption, which is, we charge, alive and well in today’s Wellington County Council Chamber, had its origins determined by the named individuals, and others. I know, strong words, but only words right? Where’s the beef – right? Be patient, I have been for 9+ years so just hold on – aright? This is the kicker Webbers! It has been worth waiting for, and now it is time!
The process of today’s Wellington County Municipal corruption started with a low key introduction in Puslinch Township in the mid – 1980’s, maybe even before, but for now let’s just focus on the ‘80’s!
At this point in time, Archie MacRobbie ruled supreme in Puslinch Township after he survived a challenge from Reeve (a.k.a. Mayor) status from the other Councillors, Gauthier (et al). In an era of “less than fair” personal “situations” related to certain Township Councillors, the “climate” suited the astute and cunning MacRobbie who played one against the other to ensure his emergence as “el supreme,” a position he held until he could pass it on to his “blind allegiance” disciple, Brad Whitcombe, who was introduced to Archie as “potential Political material” to be “molded” and groomed into shape by then Councillor Dick Visser, who himself was on board. The current relationships, being what they are between Mayor and Councillor, (re: the firemen Quinnells’), leaves one to wonder what has gone wrong?
You see, per the Whitcombe bio, he and his hard working brother, Kevin, were trying very hard to be pig farmers, and, not for the want of Kevin’s hard work, were at the point of foreclosure, when Dick Visser “saved their bacon,” if you will excuse the pun, by asking Archie MacRobbie to step in and impart his wonderful wisdom, attained through his personal experience.
He instructed “eager to learn Brad” that “there is a lot of money to be made in “the pork business,” not in livestock, but in becoming a local and beyond politician!!” Young Brad, as we now know, managed to be elected as Councillor at his first attempt, (word has it that it was his own singular vote that clinched it). Well Webbers, the partnerships were formed, and as they say, the rest is history!
Then started the “myriad” of questionable “land deals” which form the foundation of Smelly-Welly.com’s Section 122 Criminal Code accusations. Does not seem fair, Brad, does it, that Archie has been spared the anguish of being exposed for your collective indiscretions. Well, maybe you should have considered the implications which would be the product of your behaviour!
To move on with our Criminal behaviour exposure, albeit at this point “technically alleged”, Smelly-Welly.com would refer to our evidentiary records on file, and contents already shared with the Authorities related. This evidence clearly relates a system of kickbacks paid to a group per the structured process architecturally designed by Councillor Archie MacRobbie and his band of vagabonds and thieves.
Remember, in eulogy to MacRobbie, Whitcombe declared openly “Everything that I am, I owe to Archie.” Very touching indeed, but again I say “Aw come on Brad, don’t blame it all on a dead guy! Have you no honour? Not to mention, decency? Well?”
Webbers, it is on the record as sworn and witnessed, MacRobbie instructed a person, who was having a “severance problem” with the County Land Division Committee of the day, to “Just put $25,000 in cash, in a white envelope, leave it on your desk and your “problem” will just go away.” This reference, as witnessed by (4) people, myself amongst them! Further, we have a signed, sealed as witnessed by a lawyer, letter from a witness, which in essence, instructed this mature politician to “Get yourself on the Land Division Committee, and you can make thousands of dollars, as some people will pay “big money” to get a severance application passed.” Some will, some won’t!! Asked, “What kind of money are we talking here?” MacRobbie answered “Thousands of dollars.” This Webbers, sealed and signed as witnessed by a senior member of the local legal scene, almost a household name, and very recognizable.
It is no secret Webbers, that we at Smelly-Welly.com have promised you we will bring home the bacon! Well, here we go, and all coincidental in timing with our Court activities. What a coincidence! Oh yeah – sure! Keep talking Webbers.

August 4th, 2009 - Smelly-Well.com resumes reporting on our Libel Suit webpage
Well Webbers, true to form, it had to happen, and it did - this week we were, with professional courtesy from Mr. Ryder Gilliland, lawyer retained by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, interveners of record, that further to Mr. Gilliland’s well reported (2) options proposed to McCarthy Tétrault, it was agreed, and recorded in the Guelph Superior Court Office, that the Motion to Intervene filed by the C.C.L.A., will now be heard, as scheduled, for a full day, in mid-December! Wow! We wonder why? For the record, we totally support Mr. Ryder Gilliland and the C.C.L.A. in these matters, and would not question their decision one bit! The transparency behind the move, not by the C.C.L.A., but at the request of McCarthy Tétrault, we are informed, clearly confirms Smelly-Welly.com’s anticipated behavioural pattern of our adversaries. “Clear as crystal.”
We must remind our readers that the whole C.C.L.A. Intervention is that of their choice and completely independent. More than even arm’s length from the Manderson/Wilson/ Whitcombe Libel case, but relevant by legal application of my Civil Rights and Freedoms. Just like your own Webbers!
You can see Webbers, that this recent event throws to the winds any semblance of logic as to reason, except maybe this consideration by the panic driven antics of our many adversaries “lined up for shaving!”
This act by McCarthy Tétrault, to require a full day to respond to the C.C.L.A.’s Motion to Intervene, is clear in transparency of purpose! A last ditch attempt to buy precious time to cast their net of  “speculative entrapment” in the hope that I will, through my website reporting, do something to justify their appeal to Justice Cas Herold that I have behaved in a manner, (in their opinion), which puts me in contempt of Judge Herold’s temporary injunction against me, to, in his own words “Plug the dyke,” with specific reference as a product of (2) Motion Hearings, one in February 2009 and one in May 2009.
I intend to be most careful to honour His Honour, by my conformance to his directives. I would be amiss and unprofessional not to remind McCarthy Tétrault of my exposure to the Court of their Mr. Waylands unprofessional conduct which arguably injured the Court, as recorded on the Official Transcripts, and again was subjected to injury, (in my opinion), when Mr. Wayland presented contradictory evidence, with full knowledge and submitted under oath, this contradictory evidence in both the Peace Bond Criminal Case and simultaneously in the Civil Libel case. This is not permitted under law, (as I read it in Martins 2009 Guide to the Criminal Code), but again, with no lawyer retained, I am solely dependent on my layman’s interpretation! But I think I read it right and interpret Justice Herold’s reaction to its exposure by me, as recorded on the Official Hearing Transcripts, which are now published documents, freely available to the Public and on the record.
I look forward to the re-convening Court Proceedings at which time I shall address the issue before His Honour, seeking official record to reflect and recognize my argument. This behaviour is unprofessional at best, but, I believe, a matter for severe censorship by His Honour. Mr. Wayland has intentionally injured the Court, and, with respect, I think he did so with serious intent. I leave this issue in His Honour’s hands, with trust in his judgment, to address this issue with his usual fairness and serious consideration. It is my opinion, in doing, or trying to do, what he intended, he, Mr. Wayland (et al), has continued to be arrogantly disrespectful of the Court with regular consistency.
I may not be represented by counsel, and like His Honour, I may be an “old guy” who appears to drool etc, per His Honour’s recorded admonition of Mr. Wayland, but I too, like His Honour, “Do not let anything pass!” I have long rid myself of “the impetuosity of youth.” Be advised Mr. Wayland!
Now Webbers, I know you all are sensitive to the fine lines of comprehension involved, in the subtle processes being adopted by our adversaries. And are also cautious of what you see before your eyes. You are very wise, we believe, if you are of that mind set! We encourage you to continue, the opposition have now set up “the clash of the titans” -  the spoils of “bragging rights” amongst law firms, as the ultimate prize! We will not subscribe to this, but that is another revelations exposure to follow – Just be patient Webbers, and keep on talking. See you next time.

June 7th, 2009
Hi Webbers,
Considering all of the Libel case activities, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association Motion to intervene, imminently to be filed with the court, my suggestion to Justice Cas Herold to stay the Civil case (Libel), and the impending pre-trial for the Criminal case (Peace Bond), I have decided it would be, in the best interest of all involved, if we temporarily suspended the Libel/Peace Bond co-related files on our website, to enable free and clear passage of activities, introduced by the lawyers and other professionals, in these arguably co-related matters.
Therefore, after our posting of the report dated June 1st ref Peace Bond, we shall suspend temporarily this webpage, to be resurrected upon completion of the Motion Hearing of the C.C.L.A.’s Mr. Ryder Gillilands ref Montague Township vs. Page and Halton vs. Kirovac. In the Kirovac case, the Ontario Supreme Court cited as it dismissed the case against Kirovac:
“ The reason for the prohibition of defamation suits by government, lies not with the use of taxes or some obtuse theory about indivisibility of the state and the people, who make up the state. Rather it lies in the nature of democracy itself. Governments are accountable to the people through the ballot box and not to judges and juries in courts of law. When government is criticized its recourse is in the public domain, not in the courts. The government may not imprison, or fine, or sue those who criticize it! This is fundamental to democracy, “government must not silence its critics by force.”
Ontario Supreme Court Justice J. Corbett
Ref Halton Hills (town) Versus Kirovac [2006] OJ no. 1473
(Superior Court)
Webbers, this says it all. God bless all.
Regards, Bill Manderson - Smelly-Welly.com

I say - " God Bless Canadian Democracy!"


Webbers, this short and sweet posting is in response to a letter I received this AM from McCarthy Tétrault (click here).

Open response letter to McCarthy Tétrault

Dear Mr. Wayland;
I confirm receipt of your latest contribution to the mountain of documentation, at present being paid for by the Taxpayers. I must admit, you are consistent in your attempts to threaten and confuse me, with your litany of “last minute” documentation and threatening dialog! “ I will not be intimidated, young man!”
This recently referred to letter, in my humble opinion, (mine alone, no Mr. Doney, by association with his declared non-involvement in the Civil issue), causes me to admit I am constantly puzzled by your behaviour!
Per your letter attached (click here), you refer to details of a letter I shared with the Court and yourself during the matter before Mr. Justice Herold, on May 6th 2009, duly recorded on the Public transcripts of the Hearing, published on May 10th 2009 and, for the record, my most accepted, value for money spent, by me, (click here) not the Wellington County Taxpayers!
In your letter you have gone to great lengths to point out your perceived “Violations on my part.” English, since birth in 1936, has always been the “Official Language” to which I have been subjected, even the “goo, goo, goo” from my parents, in my earliest days on Earth! I know it, I love it and I understand it, I believe! Therefore, let me spell it out for you!
Mr. Wayland, we both, plus His Honour, totally know and understand your personal predicament, by your actions and the recorded reactional response, as recorded in the Official Transcripts, clearly identify His Honour gave you a huge break when he offered the “cannon fodder” documentation back to you to do with what you wish. Sending me scripted threats does nothing to endear you to me. I will continue to exercise my professional decorum of Respect for the Court, don’t be confused and interpret that as a “weakness.” This you will learn at great cost to your ego, sir!!
Yours truly, Bill Manderson 
          
May 28th, 2009
In preparation or our scheduled court appearance on May 26th, I sought and was approved to serve subpoenas on the following witnesses to be called for the court hearing. All were served, and did attend on schedule at court time. On Friday 22nd May we served : Mr. Kevin Whitcombe, Ms. Judy Seifert, Warden Joanne Ross-Zuj. It is fair to say we had no problems in serving these witnesses, however our renowned tenacity had to be brought to bear before we eventually served Guelph/Eromosa Mayor and County Councillor Chris White. The following “bizarre” report of that “serving” process, is one for the “books,” to which I shall swear an affidavit, with intent to legally pursue for action, after consultation with Mr. Doney.
It must be noted, that my Riverbend Legal Group colleague Ms. Margaret Bingham was the “Duty Driver” for the evening and witnessed the following described event, joined by, I’m sure, many of Mr. White’s neighbors who could not help but hear the eloquence of Mr. White’s, unexpected venomous tirade! But I’m getting ahead of myself (Mr. Panasonic indeed! I apologize!)
Ms. Bingham and I proceeded to the address we had for Councillor White, to complete our last serving of the evening around 6:30 pm on a beautiful spring evening in the countryside! Upon arrival at the house I received no response to the bell ringing. There was no car in the driveway. Ms. Bingham and I drove “downtown” Rockwood to have supper at a local restaurant, “excellent”!! planning to return to the house after supper, to complete our servings of subpoenas. This we did, only to find that this was Mr. White’s previous address and the current owner was unsure of Mr. White’s new address, but offered as a suggestion, we might try her next door neighbor, as they were “quite friendly” with the Whites! This I did, and now starts the craziest 45 minutes I’ve had for a long while. Cutting it short the lady of the house called Mr. White at home by phone. A short verbal exchange followed between the lady and Mr. White, ending in the lady saying “Okay Chris you’ve got to go.” The lady never secured the address, but did tell Mr. White that a man had come to her door, looking for him in order to “give him a paper.” Well ten minutes later we drove into Mr. White’s driveway and observed (2) children, 1 girl (elder) and 1 boy (younger) in the front yard doing calisthenics in their bare feet.
I exited the van, approached the kids, said “Hi kids” and proceeded to the side door of the house and mounted the porch. The door was half glazed, with a Venetian blind open, through which one could see the interior of the house. I rang the bell, the girl said “ my dad’s not home.” “Oh” I said, “Has he gone out?” “Yes” she replied, about two hours ago.” I said “Darling, did he tell you to say that?”
“No” she replied. “When do you expect him back?” I asked. “Oh, about two hours” said she with childlike uneasiness. “Did your dad tell you to say that dear?” I asked. Same guilty look “No” response. “Will you please tell your dad I’ll come back tomorrow?”
“Okay” said the girl. “Bye kids” said I and we drove out of the driveway, and proceeded up the street towards town.
“Are we going home?” asked Ms. Bingham. “No, we’re going to park in the Post Office parking lot, and wait for Chris” said I. We waited all of 7 minutes before he returned and drove his van into his driveway. We returned to the house. We arrived in the driveway and parked directly behind Mr. Whites’ van, quite close to the side door of the house. I approached the porch and made for the door, no children around, and the Venetian blinds were closed. I ran the bell once – “Ding dong!” No answer. I ran three times, “Ding dong, ding dong, ding dong!” No answer again. I rang again, holding down the button for constant ringing. This time with results! The door swung open to reveal a very upset Mr. White – red faced and eyes bulging. “Oh” I said, “you are in!”
“Get of my f-g porch!” said Mr. White. Wow! I told him to calm down and just receive this hand served subpoena which ordered him to appear in Court at 9:30 am at Courtroom #1, Criminal Court in Guelph.
“Get of my f-g porch” he said again. I said to him “Chris, this is a legal document and failure to attend will result in a warrant for your arrest being issued, and I have a witness,” motioning to Ms. Bingham in the van, with windows wide open and rolled down. He grabbed the subpoena from my had saying in a very loud voice “Give me the f-g thing and get off my f-g porch.” I wished him a pleasant weekend. He shouted, “This is my f-g house, these are my kids” as he slammed the door! I returned to the van, windows down, and reversed down the driveway only to find the little fellow standing on the street. “Get out of my f-g driveway Bill,” he said, adding, “You’re a despicable insane old man, I’m not the person you want on the stand Bill.”
Well, that was quite a serving; almost double serving I would suggest! Ms. Bingham was “most upset” and surprised that a public official like a Mayor would behave and talk like that! We learn everyday. Well, at least it was over! But was it? Well, maybe for Friday, at least that’s what I thought. Apparently now I find it has “stirred up a hornets nest” with most of the people we served! Next day, Saturday May 23rd 2009, was a very interesting day for both sides in this matter, which I shall now relate to you with the intent to swear an Oath to the honesty and accuracy of the details.
Saturday, May 23rd 2009 – During my morning breakfast I received a telephone call at 8:48 am from County Councillor John Green, from cell phone #519-835-3066 identified on my phone screen as “unknown number.” For the record, I still believe Mr. Green is a “victim of circumstances” in this terrible, disturbing mess, created by “others” and look forward to the day Mr. Green can share with the Public his concerns and “involvement” in these sorry matters effecting perceived decent men and at least one woman. But I digress again, one of my many faults, one of which is not, lying!! Mr. Green was returning a call to him, by me, the previous day, he did say, he did not have much time to talk, as he was due to attend a Board of Health Meeting at 9:00 am that Saturday morning. The Board of Health, I believe, includes the Warden Ross-Zuj, a point to consider later! I was only calling Mr. Green as a courtesy to inform him of my serving of subpoenas on Friday evening, 22nd May 2009, and upon the listed individuals. I informed Mr. Green he would not be subpoenaed in this Criminal Court matter, conforming to the promise I made to him last year, during our frequent conversations over time. He was “pushed for time” quote, and I told him I would be “at home all weekend” if he wished to expand on our conversation – he did not call!!
At 12:25 pm the same day, Saturday 23rd May 2009, I received a phone call from Christopher White at phone # 519-856-0450. I was quite surprised to receive this call from Mr. White, considering the exchange of dialog between us, as recorded and witnessed by Ms. Margaret Bingham, also as recorded. With polite apprehension I took the call and connected. Mr. White immediately fell into a most “apologetic mode” begging for my forgiveness for his “troubling tirade” which, with questionable eloquence in choice of vocabulary, was inflicted upon me when I ultimately tracked him down, to serve him with his legally executed subpoena directing him to appear in Court in Guelph, at 9:30 am, as a called witness for the Defense, i.e. me!
Mr. White’s verbal demeanor during the phone call could be accurately described as plausible; after all, it was a pretty ugly scene! He begged my forgiveness, again and again, with reason given as “the timing could not have been worse, I’m under a lot of personal stress at the moment, and last night, you appearing at my door was the last straw! I’ve just learned this week my dad has been diagnosed with a cancerous lump in his throat, and this has put me over the edge. I did not have reason to treat you as I did, you have always been respectful in our dealings and I am ashamed of myself and beg your forgiveness, and of the lady with you, who must think of me, what I can’t begin to imagine. Please ask her to forgive me! I cannot say it any stronger.”
I responded “Chris, we are all human, and, as such, are susceptible to emotional outbursts which can be the culmination of a continuous pressure buildup of emotions, which, sure as hell, must be exhausted or become a very serious blood pressure based detriment to general health. I am not immune to this myself, dealing as I do with you, and your fellow County Councillors and your collective behaviour. As for Ms. Bingham’s interpretation and intend of “What to do now” I can tell you that I shall relay your interpreted sincere apology to her and offer her advice, through my Power of Attorney, not to share this very bad for all of us, experience, with any others who do not have a need to know. I hope your dad will respond to treatment for his affliction, and that you trust in the Big “G” to assist your family through this very difficult time.” Mr. White humbly thanked me for my “compassionate understanding.” I reminded that it is a Masonic tradition; Charity to Others is a great virtue. We exchanged departing words, mine being “I only request you tell the truth on the Stand, to the questions asked.” He assured me he would, we said ‘bye then hung up the phone. I was disturbed, all things considered, but had expressed myself honestly!
I believe there is no honour in this man, as at 1:30 pm May 25th, 2009 in the parking lot behind the Criminal Court in Guelph, before witnesses, I was “served” with another legal package from the law firm of McCarthy Tétrault which contained hand written, on McCarthy Tétrault stationary, excerpts of phone conversations from identified people, taken at an undisclosed time on Saturday 23rd May 2009 by representatives of the law firm. The identified callers to the firm were” Ms. Judy Seifert, Mr. Kevin Whitcombe and Mr. Chris White ( Mayor and County Councillor). All of the above had been served with subpoenas the previous evening, the 22nd May 2009. The only outstanding listed serving was that of Warden Ross-Zuj, who was that morning of the 23rd, tied up with Councillor John Green at the Health Board Meeting, otherwise it would be anticipated she also would have been a caller into the lawyer’s office on Saturday. It would be naïve to believe no phone call exchanges were conducted between subpoena recipients on Friday evening driving the question “What do we do now?” I think we all know now! A sample is attached of page #2 of the statement recorded by the law firm (click here) on Saturday May 23rd to illustrate the format used. The complete record is on file with my lawyer of record, Mr. David Doney, for he and I to consider. This record consists of the recordings (as written) by Judy Seifert, Kevin Whitcombe and Christopher White with no time indicated when on Saturday they were taken and recorded – go ponder!
As a closing statement Webbers, you are being subjected to a business as usual behaviour of an organization in panic – just my humble opinion! Oh, by the way, sandwiched between Mr. Green’s call to me and Mr. White’s call of 12:25 pm, Mr. White phoned Councillor Lou Maieron’s number and left (2) phone messages, 20 minutes apart. The contents of the message were taped and will be submitted to Mr. David Doney for inclusion in our evidence package, as we proceed to the pre-trial of the 9th June 2009. Remember “this is not the end, nor is it the beginning of the end, but I know this is the end of the beginning.” Onward to Justice Webbers!! God Bless!

May 17th, 2009
Hi again Webbers,
Well as you will see from our recent postings on Winston Churchill and the Libel case files we have been essentially pre-occupied with our focus on these files, and will outline to you all our planned activities for the upcoming four week period, taking us into mid-June to coincide with the planned “Summer Boon Dog Days,” for County Council! Not bad work, if you can get it, pull a huge, recently applied salary increase, (not accepted in Orangeville, by the less than apathetic taxpayers there!) Nice try Councillor Scott Wilson (et al). With the summer hiatus etc., the vacation time considered, means County Councillors have a great hourly rate, better than the auto industry! What did that bring? With the focus on “real time,” Council activities, they miss out on the impending avalanche and its destructive powers, all encompassing! I refer to Court actions, involving every council member and senior staff. We anticipate many emergency meetings called by our “fearless leader Warden Ross-Screwie”, predicted to be a “one term shooting star” who lost direction, once she became an authority on outer space! Deal in the atmosphere of your reality surroundings Warden et al!
Webbers, I attended Superior Court on 6th May 2009 to answer questions of the court per an appointment request submitted by Mr. Christopher Wayland, “your totally funded, lawyer” for the “plaintiffs,” still, whoever they are, to facilitate in their submission the clear understanding of justice Herold’s interim court order, stemming from the 6th of February 2009 motions hearing. It was argued, by Mr. Wayland, that perhaps I had trouble interpreting the Judge’s terminology used in the original endorsement, and subsequently issued sealed order. Well I can tell you I spent a “most interesting and informative hour” in these recent matters. I received a clear picture related to the planned tactics of my adversaries, arguably your adversaries, realized by you all, upon your predictable awakenings to the realization of what’s going on! Panic is what’s going on Webbers, compounded by the decision by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association to seek permission to intervene in the case, not in support of me in this matter, but in the violations (alleged) of the Rights of all Taxpayers and residents and citizens of Canada. Yes, folks, it is this serious, and with respect, you should be all understanding the significant fact!!
We attach, for the record, a sealed copy of the Order, signed by Justice Herold, and post this on our website as a public document (click here). In addition, a copy of the official transcripts is available through the Court office upon request, minus any reference to a “without prejudice” off the record discussion, held between the Judge, Mr. Wayland and myself. We, any of the three involved, will not and by law, cannot, ever make reference ever, to what was discussed. We shall, without any thought not to, abide to the letter of the professional and legal protocols. I would encourage those interested in Justice to read and understand the official transcripts from the May 5th Hearing. Very educational.
With the impending Motions Hearing, related to the C.C.L.A.’s Mr. Ryder Gilliland’s intervention in this case, I am seriously considering, as a support gesture of respect and support for the C.C.L.A.’s decision to file the Motion, suspending only the Libel Suit page on our website. They should not be possibly impeded by the actions of “the well intended” people such as ourselves who could create “peripheral noise,” which could be distractive. I will make my decision by month’s end and will post said decision and supporting justification if we did decide to suspend, temporarily, the Libel Suit page on our website. In the meanwhile we shall continue to keep you informed, expiditially and in conformance with the Court Order (interim) as filed.
Currently I remain focused on this “Peace Bond” application, which is before Criminal Court, for a full day on May 26th, 2009. We go well prepared and armed with the realities of factual information to present to Court. To depict me as “Charles (Charlie) Manson,” or “Vlad the Impaler,” or Idi Amin, or any other murderous individual goes beyond all the realms of, as Justice Herold indicated in his observations, hyperbole!
But then, desperate measures are always applied by desperate people – go figure. It will be an interesting day in Court! Try to be in Court, you may be enlightened! Our Civic Leaders indeed!
Webbers, of course we will continue to be very actively involved in our investigations and reporting on all the other radar screen matters, i.e.
1) Winston Churchill Blvd/James Dick $4,000,000 jaunt!
2) Carroll Pond Municipal Drain/C.B.M./TransX/Puslinch Big Lake proposal
3) Aitkensville Pit Application/County behaviour
4) Smelly Arther/AllTreat/M.O.E. Investigation
5) Naylor Farm contamination – cover-up in Puslinch
6) Riverbend trailer park project (huge matter)
7) Libraries/ Dual-purpose buildings/Ventin Associates
8) Little Tract/Patrick Sage/Green Legacy/Ventin Associates
9) Defamation/Peace Bond/Civil Rights violations
10) Municipal Act violations (of course, alleged)
11) Utter contempt in Guelph City Council arbitration
Quite a list, and growing! You can see, very transparent to Smelly-Welly.com, the current, panic driven search for relief from the pain of Counsel’s recent realization that “just maybe I’ve been misled by my client’s” (known, for the moment, only to McCarthy Tétrault (et al) as to this secret identity of who they really are). Up until this point Webbers, and unsuspecting Taxpayers, this has cost you a bundle, with no end in sight, but fear ye not, Madam Justice is “peeking out from under her blindfold,” she will prevail! What about the “professional conduct” of all of the McCarthy Tétrault officers of the Court involved in these matters? Perhaps we should adopt their strategy against me! Perhaps we should review, and seriously consider their “ambush” tactics, planned to be forced through at the recent “Clarification of Interpretation” of Justice Herold’s Court Order of February 6th 2009. Please ask for, and read the published transcript, which, by definition, is a public document. (Designed to educate the apathetic Taxpayers who can, but don’t, attend Court.) Yes, that was a shot!
From your reading and understanding, even the most skeptical of you must comprehend what is going on, at your “big buck” cost! What is wrong with you all Webbers? Too sick and angry to yell out in protest? Leave it to someone else? Where is your decency and fairness expounded by Canadians in all things wrong in the world? Why not here at home, under you own nose? I am baffled! But do not be deterred by your pathetic apathy! Yes, you’re dammed right I am peed off! Why are not you? Cognitive dissonance?
Please consider this, and I repeat myself again, per George Orwell (author) in 1946, dying of tuberculosis, reminded us thus:
“We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proven wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it, is, sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.”
I use this constantly, with respect and recognitional endorsement, and this time I target all members of Wellington County Council and Staff, to consider these words and their applicability to this situation in which you now find yourselves! Welcome to your Waterloo!
Smelly-Welly.com, subsequent to the recent Court appearances before the Honourable Justice Cas Herold, well and accurately documented on the publicly issued transcripts, will now consider our options to pursue rectification of the “lack of Professional Conduct” of the McCarthy Tétrault partner, and officer of the Court, Mr. Christopher Wayland. Mr. Wayland, we allege, behaved in a most unprofessional manner in these Proceedings, adopting deviously planned actions in an attempt to salvage a losing case! He, and I believe, the Court, both are aware of these facts, some of which are apparent and extensively referred to in the published transcripts, available for exposure to the non Court attendee’s, the purpose being “ What do you think, Taxpayers, is this what you are funding?” We are seriously considering filing our complaint and allegations to the Law Society of Upper Canada for their critical review for possible violations of their “Rules of Professional Conduct Section (2.0 etc)
We will becoming very concerned for the performance application, and integrity, of certain officers of the Court and reserve our Constitutional Right to complain and receive a response from the L.S.U.C. in Osgood Hall, seat of our Provincial Legal System.
On 26th May 2009 I shall appear in Criminal Court to defend my good name and confront my accusers to fight their ridiculous Peace Bond against me, citing me as a person who will physically inflict damage to them and their families. They have a “tiger by the tail,” I only use legal resolutions to any issue I have with anyone, my record of non-violence proves my belief that “the pen is mightier than the sword.”
With cool precision in presentation, I shall publicly expose the purpose and desperate attempt by my accusers to “attack the messenger” and attempt to influence the ongoing Superior Court matter, which is, by association, the catalyst for this Criminal matter. Truth and Justice will continue to prevail.
We believe, considering the recent Court events, our adversaries will opt to respond to Mr. Gilliland’s indicated availability dates for a 2 hour Motions Hearing, that they will choose the one with the most time, which will be gratefully received by them to allow them time to address the negative position they find themselves, and the Council for the County of Wellington, their clients, must realize their vulnerability to this irresponsible decision made by this County Council. Councillors (et al), this is not going away, even though you’re planned and timely absence through the summer shutdown. There are many issues that we, Smelly-Welly.com, will be working on to welcome you all back to the real world in September.
Have a good summer, I assure you we, the overcharged Taxpayers will! We now prepare Webbers, for Criminal Court on the 26th May 2009, scheduled for a whole day in Court. I look forward to my day in Court and shall continue to report all of the relative public disclosure details, “open Kimono” folks. Keep talking, keep watching!

May 5th, 2009
To: The Honourable Justice Cas Herold
From: Mr. William Smith Manderson
Dear Sir,
re: Whitcombe / Wilson vs. William Manderson meeting, in Guelph Ontario, 6th May 2009

Good day Your Honour,
Per the notice of this meeting, called by Mr. Wayland (et al) to address his issues as indicated in his submissions on the record, I come before this Court today.
For the record, I have not been successful in my endeavors to retain legal counsel due to my inability to financially afford this service, with no interest out there for the possibility of a “Shining Knight,” prepared to work on a “pro bono term of retainer.” Having said that sir, it will not come as a surprise to you, that I intend to participate in this meeting, in good faith, and great respect for the process and the Court!
At the conclusion of Mr. Wayland’s anticipated submissions, I wish to respond to the Court with my personally prepared submissions, per my interpretations of the documentation submitted by Mr.Wayland, on behalf of his “alleged” clients, the sole plaintiffs Bradford Whitcombe and Scott Wilson, as recorded, but as you know, Your Honour, a disputed issue, raised by me, and still an open issue for due course consideration.
Your Honour, I shall respond orally to the points “interpreted” contention, anticipated to be argued by Mr. Wayland against his interpreted violations by me, of your order, per the Motions Hearing of February 6th 2009, in Guelph, before Your Honour.
In addition, I beg the Court’s indulgence to please permit me to present to Your Honour facts of inconsistent unprofessional behaviour, on behalf of an officer of the Court, Mr. Wayland, (“notably” in my opinion), which I believe has injured the Court.
For the record, I get no pleasure from what I am about to put on the public record, as results of a systematical analyses of events, related to this matter, before the Court. Your Honour, I beg the Court’s indulgence to consider the following chronology related to the co-related events, in these matters before the Court. i.e.: Chronology of events and related points of challenge

Pre-January 13th 2009 (2) Notice of Intent, from McCarthy Tétrault

January 13th 2009 - Libel Notice, filed with Guelph Court on behalf of the Plaintiffs Whitcombe / Wilson January 13th 2009 original Statement of Claim filed with Guelph Court and assigned Court file # 31/09.  Note: Statement of Claim contains strategic extrapolations from full scripted documents. Distortion of record.

January 21st 2009 - Amended Statement of Claim, filed with Guelph Court on that date with additional Points of Claim.

January 21st 2009  - Plaintiffs’ (plural) Factum filed with Guelph Court on that date, with references. To the “alleged plaintiffs’ interpretation of my documented opinions of their behaviour, as indicated.

January 16th 2009 - Motion record (175 pages). filed with Guelph Court on that date per index #’s Tab 2 Affidavit of Scott Wilson, sworn January 14th 2009 and Tab 3, Affidavit of Brad Whitcombe, sworn January 14th 2009. (All prepared by McCarthy Tétrault prior to January 14th 2009.) See copied Index.

January 16th 2009 – Supplementary Motion Record Tabs #1, 2 and ‘A’ through ‘D’ (160 pages) All above for Court File #31-09 Superior Court

We now address submissions made by McCarthy Tétrault on behalf of the self same Plaintiffs in Criminal Court under an Information #09145/09146 per a Peace Bond Request, against William Smith Manderson, on behalf of the complainants Scott Wilson and Bradford Whitcombe! Counsels of Record are Christopher A. Wayland and Steven Tanner, both of the law firm of McCarthy Tétrault L.L.P.
      On January 19th 2009 the complainants, Scott Wilson and Bradford Whitcombe, swore before a Justice of the Peace, in Guelph, a request for a Peace Bond to be granted against William Smith Manderson under Section 810 of the Criminal Code, citing their fear of me inflicting physical injury etc against themselves and specified members of their respective families. In addition, I am cited as their cause for concern that I shall also cause damage to their property.
      I categorically deny any thoughts, or intent, to harm anyone, or their property. I declare my Intent, under my Lawful Rights, per our laws and the Charter, to defend my Good Name and Reputation before the Court, and expose the motivation behind such actions by the complainants. I enclose copies of the filed complaints. It is worth noting that again, and not for the first time, the O.P.P., after their investigations, found no grounds for this action and removed themselves from the process, followed by the Crown Attorney’s Office, thus making this a private matter. The Hearing proper is scheduled for a full day in Court time at Criminal Courtroom #1 on 26th May 2009.
      My reason for the referral to this Criminal matter is to bring to Justice Herold’s attention the contents of the Affidavits of Scott Wilson and Brad Whitcombe, in the Criminal matter and on the Public record.
      Included in their submission to the Court was documented a copy of the “controversial poem” ordered by Judge Herold to be removed from my website, which I did, but now the Plaintiffs lawyer is “crying foul,” because I posted on my website the Affidavits on the Public record, which contained in its enclosure a copy of the poem, on their Public Document! Far be it for me to interfere, and change, their evidence, through removal of any statements made by them to the Court!
      Your Honour may detect an “air of contempt” from me, and you would be correct in your assumption, but let me assure you sir, my contempt is not for this Court, or the process of judgmental decision; it is for the attempt by Officers of the Court to knowingly deceive and obfuscate their deceit, because they realized a “grave error” committed by them in their attempts to move this matter along at great haste, to protect their high paying clients, in my respectful submitted opinion! Let me explain to the Court the recorded facts before the Court, and refer to the documentation applicable! It is very important to consider that arrogantly they thought this a pushover, taking on a 73 year old geriatric with no money and thereby no opportunity to retain counsel, or even gain Public support! Shades of arrogance I would say, up there with “Ozymandias, King of Kings!” Shelley did a good number on him! A good lesson in life generally ignored by the self-perceived all powerful.
      The Affidavits of both the Plaintiffs say it all, your Honour, and with your requested patience and understanding, I request you to permit me to take you there!
      Before we do, it is an important point to recognize that on February 6th 2009, at the Motions Hearing, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association was not even on the radar screen, not so today, 3 months later!
      Now we proceed. I wish to submit as evidence, copies of the sworn Affidavits of Plaintiffs, Bradford Whitcombe and Scott Wilson, both sworn and sealed in Guelph, on January 14th, 2009. I submit copies to the Court now for the record.
      I wish to relate to the Affidavit of Scott Wilson as a start. It is my intent to address all of the content of this Affidavit as an integral part of my case. During the impending Court case, the configuration of which will be greatly influenced by the decision made by the Court related to the C.C.L.A.’s Motion to Intervene, which is well on in the process of a Court Hearing. Mr. Ryder Gilliland has been retained by the C.C.L.A. to argue their Civil Rights Abuse case. This C.C.L.A. intervention, on behalf of the Law, Civil Rights, etc, is a stand alone process, at more than arm’s length inclusion in my matter before the Court, but obviously is a controlling factor, whether successful in its submissions related to the case law of Montague versus Page, or unsuccessful. Either way there will be influential fallout results, but more on that after the judgment. Note: C.C.L.A. were not a consideration until after the February 6th Motions Hearing, and this leads into my points related to recorded submissions made in Public documentation prior to February 6th, 2009.
      At the February 6th Motions Hearing, Mr. Wayland made a big issue of my remarks pertaining to “anger management proposals” made by me to facilitate help for Mr. Wilson, reference letter dated June 15th 2007. Your Honour, on page #39, line #20 of the official Hearing transcripts, Mr. Wayland refers to his clients being mentally ill, seriously mentally ill (an opinion) and, in fact, impaired. The Court’s response are reported, you respond with the question on line # 23, “Them personally, or their judgment?” The answer from Mr. Wayland was “Them personally, Your Honour.” On page #40, line #3 – 5, Mr. Wayland re-emphasis’s his point, “ticking time bombs who need serious help” etc. That statement was my human compassion for these individuals. On page #42, line #19 Your Honour has hit the point which was instrumental to creating the conditions, driving this matter to be heard before the Courts. I shall expand on this during Trial. Your Honour’s observations on page #47, line #23 are indeed prophetic, in the time lapse since February 6th, this has been the case in all of our considered areas. On page #57 of the transcripts, line #10 through 25, I make my point for the record, pertaining to being mentally ill and impaired. I submit that in the Criminal case Affidavit, both Plaintiffs in this case accuse me of inflicting upon them, quote, (per page #9 of Scott Wilson’s Affidavit (par 28)), “As a result of Mr. Manderson’s actions” etc, in paragraph 27, Mr. Wilson’s arguable paranoia is the catalyst for his claim against me, to believe I am waging a “psychological war” against him and that I have caused him to “suffer psychological harm to date” (January 14, 2009) “which is affecting my ability to function both in the workplace and my personal life.” Your Honour, a classic admission of GUILT, and a lashing out at me as the exposer!
      Mr. Whitcombe’s similar Affidavit, sworn in Guelph 14th January 2009 both Affidavits sworn well before the Motions Hearing of 6th February 2009. Your Honour, why did not Mr. Wayland address these very serious accusations against me in your Proceedings? Mr. Whitcombe’s sworn Affidavit contains more of this common claim, only in Criminal Court, that I have a plan to subject Mr. Wilson and Mr. Whitcombe to psychological harm and indeed “I have suffered” etc as depicted in paragraphs #27 through 33. This is puzzling enough, but why would Mr. Wayland make such an issue to my claims, (which appear now to be valid per the evidence), in your Court, Your Honour, on the 6th February? He can’t claim “I did not know, Your Honour,” his clients did not draft this document in both cases!
      I submit Your Honour, that this was an arrogant mistake made by my adversaries who would use this tactic of “shoot the messenger” to distract attention from the real issues in this matter. “He called me a Nazi,” Your Honour? “He said I’m mentally impaired,” Your Honour? How about “Oh no, we’ve been exposed,” Your Honour? Much scrutiny has to be given, in my humble opinion, related to the professional, and, dare I say it, legal behaviour of all my adversaries, lawyers included. “Privileged information” indeed Mr. Wayland. Consider Rule #2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, per the Law Society of Upper Canada Mr. Wayland! You know what I mean!
      Your Honour, this frivolous and vexatious behaviour at best, on the part of the “alleged Plaintiffs and their representative officers of the Court, in my humble respectful submission, should be addressed now, with great respect Your Honour. The Plaintiffs complain that I am damaging their reputations – What about my reputation Your Honour? Do I not have the Right to defend my reputation? Depicting me as another “Charles Manson (et al)” does not endear me to this parcel of individuals. Mr. Wayland (et al) in my respectful submission, has injured the Court. Your Honour, I would expect and respect, will decide the validity of my claims and act accordingly, as prescribed by law!
      Your Honour, I thank you for your patience and respect for my Rights and Entitlements in your Court. I will conclude my presentation by stating for the record, before witnesses, my oral Notice of Intent, which will be formalized when I retain a lawyer, “hope springs eternal,” I am a man of faith!
      I hereby give Notice of Intent that I shall, on behalf of the Riverbend Legal Group, inclusive of myself, a Motion and Cross Claim, to sue the Corporation for the County of Wellington, Corporation of the Township of Puslinch, for, at minimum, a violation of our individual Human Rights and Freedoms. We shall seek damages totaling $6,000,000 for punitive and other specified infractions to which we have been subjected!
      I enter these discussions of today, 6th May 2009 with conviction and my assurance to all, of my honest and ethical commitment to co-operate with truthful facts as I know them.
Thank you Your Honour

William Smith Manderson

Addendum To letter dated 5th May, 2009 addressed to Justice, the Honourable Cas Herold
      Your Honour, I apologize for this submission of my afterthoughts, subsequent to my letter. In light of the recognized, as yet to be determined, intervention of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the result of their Motion Hearing which can influence greatly the structure of this case before your Court, would it be sensible and responsible to stay this Proceeding, until it is determined, from the Intervention Hearing, whether or not a dismissal judgment is rendered. The costs to the Taxpayers, Court costs, McCarthy Tétrault costs and others, are mounting daily. One element to consider is to allocate the total costs, up to the time of judgment, to the Plaintiffs personally or the Corporation for the County of Wellington et al, not the Taxpayers? Please sir, would you please consider the possible (probable) conclusion and its implications, considering the C.C.L.A. are not requesting costs nor expect costs to be applied to them! The bills have to be paid, but not, I respectfully submit, by the Taxpayers of Wellington County!
Thank You Sir
Bill Manderson

Formal Request to Judge Cas Herold - February 6, 2009

To: The Honourable Justice Mr. Cass Herold
From: Mr. Bill Manderson – Smelly-Welly.com
Dear Sir,

Ref: Whitcombe/Wilson versus William Manderson
Court File #31-09
As an intergral part of your endorsement, related to this matter, heard before your Court on February 2nd, 2009, you referred to the benefit to the Court of having confirmation of Ministerial and Corporation Investigations under way, as indicated on my covering submission letter, received by the Court.
I have taken your “passing observation” for positive inclusion to the Record in these matters, as a “semi-formal request” for acquisition of written statements of proof of ongoing Investigations, on behalf of the Provincial Ministries and Corporations identified. Sir, I have contacted all of my related interactories, within the structure of the Investigations, requesting of them a written confirmation of Investigative activity, being conducted by their respective organisations.
To a man, they have requested that they receive, from the Honourable Court, a letter from Your Honour, detailing your requested information. I believe, under their current level of Legal Process, the request is not unreasonable, considering the depth of issues being addressed by the very senior Administrative groups, for all Parties, which involves the (2) named Plaintiffs.
For your consideration and consultation, Your Honour, I would list for you the following identified information to enable the Court, in these matters.
For the Record, I am positive this information is crucial to this case, for the Court’s understanding of motive, on behalf of the Plaintiffs, to move the Proceedings forward at a high rate of haste. We would be wise not to do so, considering the evidentiary yield from the Investigations per sé.
I wish to identify, with their expressed permission, a list of related contacts who have been assigned by their Ministries and Corporations, to interact with me in our collective endevours to establish the facts of the issues, identified as pertaining to each Administration and their relationship to the Plaintiffs, The County of Wellington and Puslinch Township.
My contacts are:   
1) Ministry of Natural Resources – Mr. Al Murray (Guelph Area Team Supervisor)
1 Stone Road West, Guelph
Phone: (519) 826-4914  Fax: (519) 826-4929
Issues:                       
1) Winston Churchill Blvd/James Dick Construction
2) Carroll Pond Municipal Drain/C.B.M.
2) Ministry of the Environment – Mr. Derrick Reilly, Investigative Branch (Hamilton)
Phone: 1-800-688-4577
Local Contact – Ms. Dolly Goyette
Phone: (519) 826-4286
Issues:
1) Carroll Pond Municipal Drain
2) Arthur/AllTreat odours
3) TransX contamination
3) Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing – Mr. Roger Moyer, District Manager (southwest region) London, Ontario
Phone: 1-800-265-4736   Fax: (519) 873-4018
Issues:                       
Ref: Provincial Municipal Act Potential Violations
4) Ontario Provincial Police – Det. Stf. Sgt. Martin Murray, Ontario Headquarters, Orillia
Phone: (705) 329-6400   Fax: (705) 329-6456
Issues:
On assignment to support per Headquarters O.P.P.
Total range on behalf of the Attorney General’s Office
5) Region of Peel – Corporate Services (Legal)
Snr. Legal Manager Mr. Patrick O’Connor and Snr. Legal Manager Mr. Douglas Gates
10 Peel Centre Drive (5th floor)
Brampton, Ontario L6T 4B9
Phone: (905) 791-7800   Fax: (905) 791-1693
Issues:
$2 Million cost of Winston Churchill Blvd as 50% of Total cost agreement with Wellington County Council                                 (Plaintiffs heavily involved)
6) Corporation for the City of Guelph
Her Worship Mayor Karen Farbridge, C.A.O. Mr. Hans
Loewig, City Solicitor Ms. Lois Payne
Phone: (519) 837-5643   Fax: (519) 8277
Your Honour, may I suggest a “Form Letter” from you, and sent to each of the identified interactories, for their responses, with expediency.

I include mr. Wayland on distribution as conformance to ethical protocol. Thank you, Sir.

Feburary 14 2009
Confusion in Court! And a Happy Valentine’s Day to all our webbers!
What a week this has been for Smelly-Welly.com! We have been very busy with the high volume of emails received from our website, all, gratefully indicated words of encouragement, in the current Court related, high activity, further to our website’s focused intent – To bring you the truth!
We applaud Mr. Justice Herold’s fairness and wisdom in his interim handling of the (2) most recent Motion Hearings! Most of the press coverage has been fair, but again the expected pro-County weekly publication from Fergus remains transparently bias. Well, thank God for Freedom of Speech. They too will, at the end of this battle for Justice, be forced to admit the truth in these matters, as proven, in Court, before the Laws of man and God! I add God, as a believer, and reflect on the commandment “Thos shalt not bear false witness.” The very foundation of our laws is from the actions of the “Good men of Runneymead,” who originated the recent popular hip saying “No way José.” Addressing the demise of the “Right of Kings,” as the only alternative to Civil War, forced King John of England to accept the Magna Carta. The origin of Civil Rights as we know them today! And all from 400+ years ago. Not too shabby guys! The truly “Great Charter” which made all men, and women, equal under Law!
With this sense of entitlement, and the Canadian Charter of Independence from Westminster, supported in Law by the Canadian Bill of Rights, we shall proceed, undaunted by the obnoxious attempts by our adversaries, to suppress the truth from Public exposure. We shall prevail, as we come armed with that great enabler – Truth!! We must continue to believe that Truth and Justice are as close as any two twins can be! End of Monologue!
We start this report by challenging Warden Joanne Ross-Zuj’s justification of the County footing the huge costs for legal representation of the Plaintiffs in this Defamation matter before the Courts, a total of, let’s count them, (4) high priced “Legal Guns” from the firm of McCarthy Tétrault of Toronto! I must say, I am personally flattered that through the size of this retainer in dollars, for (4) gunfighters to take on “little old me,” confirms the desperation within Council “as a whole” that their, at best, absolute ineptitude, but the fact that other obvious disturbing elements of mis-management etc, will be exposed to the unsuspecting and “cognizant dissonance suffering apathetic electorate” and other Taxpayers! I am representing your civil rights, inclusive of my own, in these matters, before the Court, costing you, the source of all funding – Don’t you get the picture yet?
Warden Ross-Zuj has pronounced “Tweety Bird like” “They (the Plaintiffs) work for us (the County), and it is correct that we provide legal representation to allow them to do their jobs,” not “totally accurately verbatim” as a quote, but close enough!
Ms. Rookie Warden of (6) week’s tenure, I wish to point out to you, that the “us” you refer to has no validity! You seem to forget, in your “swept up euphoria” that it is the “us”, “us,” the Taxpayers, who put little crosses in little boxes, which determines just who “us” really is! You’ve been in the job a couple of hours and you have forgotten already that the “little people” who sent you to County Council for the last two years, have the power to unseat you! No, I will not say it! As a proud Scot, I cannot and will not permit you or your ilk to continue to behave as you do personally, as the “mouthpiece” of others. You can’t wear the mantle!
It is common knowledge, and admitted to me personally, that the only reason we are in Court today was an “in camera” Motion to proceed, proposed by a very frustrated County Councillor, who had the sense of responsibility to “bring this matter to a head once and for all.” The Motion received a seconder, (not Whitcombe I believe), and the Motion was carried! Mr. Thomson of McCarthy Tétrault was instructed to proceed, on behalf of the Wellington County Council, not the so-called Plaintiffs!
What a shock for Whitcombe and Wilson, throwing their (2) intimidating “Notices of Intent,” designed to “persuade” me to “cower away in fear,” when $2.5 Million was indicated as being the burden I faced! Now $2.5 Million may sound to be, in your minds, intimidating enough to ensure your continued façade of respectability and promote sympathy, from those outside of your close “circle of friends” – Well chaps – No dice! Nada!
You should dwell on the accurate words of that “sorry human being” Janice Joplin, who reminds us that: “Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose, and I know that’s good enough for me, good enough for me and Bobbie McGee.” (N.B.) All free men and women are Bobbie McGee.
To threaten a man with no money with a dollar figure of $2.5 Million personifies your lack of reality, all of you who voted for the Councillor’s Motion to proceed. Whitcombe and Wilson must have been more panic stricken than they already were! Pretty dumb move on the part of County Council. “Let’s sue the jerk for $2.5 Million, that will shut him up!” It’s the equivalent of throwing a drowning man a “cast iron life preserver,” not knowing that, if “God is good,” you will hit him in the head, knock him unconscious, so he will not know he drowned! Pretty stupid I’d say! What do you think? We would like to hear from you on that and any other comments you would care to make! Remember, dialog is a great communication tool!! Keep it coming!
Dumb indeed, but indicative of this Council’s apparent lack of good sound decision making, as a product of intelligent dialog, and good solid debate, to consensus! Very, very poor! But who’s to challenge? No person ever has! Ladies and Gentlemen, let me introduce myself – I am Mr. Bill Manderson, I will challenge, even after my 170+ letters remain unrecorded as received through the Clerk’s office. The show is over; it’s time to call it a day etc (prophetic I would say).
I believe, and have faith in the Public’s sense of fairness, to the degree that I expect some source of legal representation to come forward, and represent all of the incognizant victims of this seriously questionable Corporation of Wellington County (et al).
Accordingly I hereby give my “Notice of Intent” to serve on the Corporation of Wellington County, a cross claim, on behalf of the Riverbend Legal Group (et al) for violation of our legal rights to challenge which carries a total financial claim of $6 Million. See you all in Court!
PS – Webbers, we are getting “Good Vibes” of impending decisions from all of the Corporations’ and Ministerial Investigations, currently underway, and identified to Mr. Justice Herald’s Court, and recorded in the official transcripts! Good news!! Timing is everything folks!

Court Battle Looms For Blogger - Guelph Mercury Report, January 23rd, 2009
GUELPH - A Wellington County Councillor and its chief adminstative officer are seeking a peace bond against a local citizen journalist and self professed County watchdog. Bill Manderson was served at his home yesterday with a summons to appear at the Ontario Court of Justice in Guelph on February 2nd. In the summons documents Councillor and Puslinch Mayor Brad Whitcombe and C.A.O. Scott Wilson claim they have grounds to fear personal injury or damage to their property, based on alleged threats made between March 5, 2007, and Janurary 19, 2009.
None of these claims have been proven in court.
If a judge issues the proposed peace bond, Manderson would be bound to "keep the peace and be of good behaviour" for a year in relation to the officals. Violating such a bond can be a criminal offence. The alleged threats come from letters written to staff and Councillors - 170 letters in total - and postings on Manderson's website, Smelly-Welly.com. On the website, Manderson evaluates County staff and Councillor performances (click here for details) and explores various current and past County actions and decisions. The comments cited include:"purge this Council of this chronic pestilence, being intentionally spread by identified predators, know to you all! Where is your morality? Decency? Honesty?"
Calls for comment to the lawyer for Wilson and Whitcombe weren't returned yesterday.
Manderson informed the Mercury of yesterday's summons, along with other legal actions including a motion for an injunction to remove certain items from his website. In the injunction, Manderson's actions are called a "campaign of defamation."
No claims in that case have been established in court.
Documents filed in that action claim Manderson compares Wilson and Whitcombe to historical villans and suggests they repeatedly collaborated on myriad inappropriate matters. The website focuses, in part, on money spent on Winston Churchill Boulevard (click here), the Ministry of Environment Investiagtion at the Arthur-based compost facility All Treat Farms (click here), and spending on the Carroll Pond Municipal Drain in Puslinch (click here). When asked whether he intends to remove any items from his website, Manderson said no.
Manderson, a regular at County Meetings, said his ultimate goal is "justice." He said he has researched County affairs for nine years. His blog was created more than a year ago. Reported by Nicole O'Reilly

Thursday January 8, 2009
To: Mr. Doug Thomson, Lawyer – McCarthy Tétrault (et al)
Re: Your clients (deleted) per your notice of intent letter of October 28th 2008
Dear Mr. Thomson (et al);
Having taken a period of time to reflect upon the prevailing situation which confronts me, per this public letter posted on our website, Smelly-Welly.com, I wish to record the following details in the Public Forum, to enable you and your “clients” to understand my responses to your perceived letter of desperation. I am completely cognizant of your client’s bad situation, and would further challenge the lack of transparency in this notice issuance on me!
Mr. Thomson, knowing the importance in these matters, related to terminology as written, I have a clarification request of you, to clearly define who, which, or what your claim to represent in this Issuance of Notice and would beg your indulgence to respond to my questions in a fair and equitable timeframe. Please define accurately your answers to:
Your letter references quote “Wellington County.” Is this a geographical statement of reference or should this read “Wellington County Council”?
Is “Wellington County Council” applicable, as the decision to file “Notice of Libel,” was a voted decision, made in camera, by full County Council? If so, then by association, your client’s are the Wellington County Council, and by association, every Councillor who voted in favour is a Plaintiff! As a Plaintiff, they, those applicable, are open to cross-examination by my Counsel in Court. We have many unanswered questions to pose (under oath) with the perjury element forever present! And, as a group of Plaintiffs, not Defendants, they cannot assume their legal costs can be borne by the Taxpayers.
Your named Plaintiffs may think that, by the inclusion of the Council per sé, although not stated, they would qualify for Taxpayer paid legal fees, something like White versus Johnson, if you get my comparative drift. We look forward to, with interest, your formal documentation filed with the Court against me, documented accurately for clarification of identification of the Plaintiffs named, in total in this matter.
We shall be pleased to receive them expediently, to share with all of the related agencies with which we are presently interacting, to establish finally, our collective and individual charges, which will be filed against your clients. We draw this elements to your attention, to enable you to clearly define the process and issues, for all of your clients!
 I assume you will now govern yourself accordingly, and oblige us with an expedient response in Good Faith. On November 3, 2008 Smelly-Welly.com through Bill Manderson, has been served with the attached letter from the law firm of McCarthy Tétrault of Toronto, giving notice of a libel action suit against Mr. Manderson for the alledged libelous statements made through our website against their clients (deleted).
Copies of the notice letter and my response are now posted on our website for your information. We assure you all of our clear intent to continue to report and print the truth in these matters. We thank all of you who have referenced our website and as your hit numbers increase, we will facilitate the exposure of the truthful facts in these matters. On November 3rd we got proof that we have made great progress. Here for you all to see is my response to the letter I received on November 3rd.
RE: Libel Notice dated October 31st, 2008 on behalf of (deleted).
I confirm receipt of the letter on the 3rd of November, 2008, hand delivered legal package, pertaining to the above, on behalf of your clients, (deleted). To save your clients more expense I would hereby notify you of my strongest refusal to retract or remove from our website, Smelly-Welly.com, any documentation inclusive of your referenced statements or documents related to your clients, (deleted).
Please receive this letter (response) as notice of this response and thank you for the long awaited planned opportunity to facilitate the exposure of the truth, in these matters. It never ceases to surprise me that lawyers automatically believe that their clients would not lie to them! Amazing Mr. Thomson! This has nothing to do with the "Presumption of Innocence," they are the plaintiffs! See you in court, Councillors
Yours truly, Bill Manderson

Back to HOME